
Skill
nemo-mbridge-perf-activation-recompute
optimize GPU memory with activation recompute
Description
Validate and use selective and full activation recompute in Megatron Bridge to reduce GPU memory usage at the cost of extra compute.
SKILL.md
Activation Recompute
Stable docs: @docs/training/activation-recomputation.md Card: @skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-activation-recompute/card.yaml
What It Is
Activation recompute trades GPU compute for memory by discarding intermediate activations during the forward pass and recomputing them during backward. Megatron Bridge supports two granularities:
| Granularity | What you specify | What gets recomputed | Memory savings | Compute cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
selective | recompute_modules list (e.g. core_attn, mlp) | specific submodules within each layer | moderate (module-dependent) | low to high |
full | recompute_num_layers + recompute_method | entire transformer layers (N layers) | strongest | highest |
Note: MCore names these "selective" (submodule-level) vs "full" (layer-level).
"Full" means recomputing full layers, not the full model — you still choose
how many layers via recompute_num_layers.
Quick Decision
- Rule out allocator fragmentation first with
PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True; see @skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-memory-tuning/SKILL.md. - For activation pressure, start with selective recompute:
recompute_granularity="selective"andrecompute_modules=["core_attn"]. - Add modules by cost:
"layernorm"is cheap but saves little, while"mlp"saves much more memory at a clear throughput cost. - Use full-layer recompute only when selective recompute does not fit, and set
all required fields:
recompute_granularity="full",recompute_method, andrecompute_num_layers. - With FP8 or TE-scoped CUDA graphs, avoid full-layer recompute unless graph
scope is
full_iteration; otherwise use selective recompute or disable TE graph capture.
CPU offloading (cpu_offloading=True) is an alternative that avoids recompute
cost entirely, but it is incompatible with PP > 1.
Enablement
Selective recompute
cfg.model.recompute_granularity = "selective"
cfg.model.recompute_modules = ["core_attn"] # add "layernorm", "mlp", or other valid modules as needed
Full-layer recompute
cfg.model.recompute_granularity = "full"
cfg.model.recompute_method = "uniform"
cfg.model.recompute_num_layers = 4
Available recompute_modules
| Module | What it recomputes | Compute cost | Memory savings |
|---|---|---|---|
core_attn | attention softmax/dropout/QKV dot product | low (Flash Attention already recomputes internally) | moderate |
layernorm | layer normalization | negligible (~0%) | negligible |
mlp | full FFN block | high (~16% on Llama3 70B, hidden=28672) | ~3 GB |
moe | MoE expert dispatch | varies | varies |
moe_act | MoE activation functions | low | small |
shared_experts | shared expert layers | moderate | moderate |
mla_up_proj | Multi-Latent Attention up projection | moderate | moderate |
Performance harness CLI
uv run python scripts/performance/run_script.py \
-m llama \
-mr llama3_8b \
--task pretrain \
-g h100 \
-c bf16 \
-ng 8 \
--recompute_modules core_attn,layernorm \
...
Compatibility and Constraints
recompute_granularity=selectiverequires a non-emptyrecompute_moduleslistrecompute_granularity=fullrequiresrecompute_methodandrecompute_num_layers- Layer-level recompute (
recompute_granularity="full"+recompute_num_layers) is incompatible with TE-scoped CUDA graphs. MCore calls this "full" granularity — the name refers to recomputing full transformer layers, not the full model. Even though you're selecting how many layers to recompute, MCore treats it differently from submodule recompute. Any TE-scoped scope (attn,mlp,moe_router, etc.) will assert. This commonly hits FP8 configs that enable TE-scoped graphs by default (e.g.LLAMA3_70B_SFT_CONFIG_H100_FP8_CS_V1setscuda_graph_impl="transformer_engine",cuda_graph_scope="mlp"). Options:- use submodule recompute (
recompute_granularity="selective"+recompute_modules) — compatible with TE-scoped graphs - disable CUDA graphs (
cuda_graph_impl="none") and use layer-level recompute - switch to
cuda_graph_impl="local",cuda_graph_scope="full_iteration"
- use submodule recompute (
distribute_saved_activations=Truecannot be combined withsequence_parallel=True- Combining
mlp+core_attnrecompute is slightly worse thanmlpalone due to double recompute overhead
Measured Results
Llama3 70B SFT on 32x H100 80GB, FP8 (Current Scaling):
- Baseline: TP=4, PP=4, VPP=5, DP=2, MBS=1, GBS=32, seq_len=4096
- Golden GPU utilization: 709.93 TFLOP/s/GPU
- Regression threshold: 5%
| Experiment | recompute_modules | TFLOP/s/GPU | vs Golden | Peak Mem (GB) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | core_attn | ~704 | -0.8% | 58.8 (OOM rank0) | OOM |
| Exp 1 | mlp | 593.6 | -16.4% | 55.6 | Perf regression |
| Exp 2 | mlp, core_attn | 586.8 | -17.3% | 55.6 | Perf regression |
| Exp 3 | core_attn, layernorm | ~702 | -1.1% | 59.6 (OOM rank0) | OOM |
Key takeaways:
layernormrecompute is nearly free compute-wise but saves negligible memorymlprecompute saves ~3 GB peak but costs ~16% because the Llama3 70B FFN (hidden=28672) is expensive to recompute- Combining
mlp+core_attnis slightly worse thanmlpalone - For this workload, the actual OOM fix was
PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True(memory fragmentation, not capacity). See @skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-memory-tuning/SKILL.md.
Code Anchors
Recompute modules enum and selective checkpoint logic
# 3rdparty/Megatron-LM/megatron/core/transformer/transformer_block.py
# _checkpointed_forward() applies selective recompute based on recompute_modules
Recompute config validation
# 3rdparty/Megatron-LM/megatron/core/transformer/transformer_config.py
# Validates recompute_granularity, recompute_method, recompute_num_layers
Llama3 recipe defaults
# Memory saving (recompute & offloading)
cfg.model.recompute_granularity = None
cfg.model.recompute_modules = None
cfg.model.fine_grained_activation_offloading = False
cfg.model.offload_modules = None
Full recompute + CUDA graph assertion (MCore)
if self.recompute_granularity:
if self.recompute_granularity != "selective":
assert self.cuda_graph_scope == [
CudaGraphScope.full_iteration
], "full recompute is only supported with full iteration CUDA graph."
CPU offloading PP incompatibility (MCore)
if self.cpu_offloading and self.pipeline_model_parallel_size > 1:
raise ValueError(
"Currently there is no support for Pipeline parallelism with CPU offloading"
)
Failure Diagnosis
| Symptom | Cause | Confirm | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| >15% GPU utilization drop | mlp recompute on a large FFN | check whether recompute_modules includes mlp | remove mlp, lower micro batch size, or use CPU offload if PP=1 |
| Still OOM after adding layernorm | layernorm activations are too small to move the peak materially | compare peak memory before/after | switch to a higher-impact module or full-layer recompute |
AssertionError: full recompute is only supported with full iteration CUDA graph | layer-level recompute with TE-scoped graph capture | check cuda_graph_impl and cuda_graph_scope | use selective, set cuda_graph_impl=none, or use local + full_iteration |
| ValueError: PP + CPU offloading | cpu_offloading=True with pipeline_model_parallel_size > 1 | check PP config | disable CPU offloading or set PP=1 |
| mlp+core_attn worse than mlp alone | double recompute overhead | compare Exp 1 vs Exp 2 | use mlp alone |
Known Limitations
- Per-module memory savings vary significantly by model architecture and hidden dimension
- No automatic module selection — users must choose which modules to recompute
layernormrecompute is almost never worth it as a standalone fix- CPU offloading (the zero-compute-cost alternative) is blocked when PP > 1
Verification
uv run python -m pytest \
tests/unit_tests/training/test_config.py -k "recompute" -q
Success criteria:
- Unit tests pass for recompute config validation
- No assertion errors from config validation
More skills from the skills repository
View all 285 skillsaccelerated-computing-cudf
accelerate data processing with cuDF
Jul 14Data AnalysisData EngineeringNVIDIAPerformanceaiq-deploy
deploy and manage NVIDIA AI-Q infrastructure
Jul 14DeploymentInfrastructureNVIDIAaiq-research
conduct deep research with AI-Q
Jul 14AgentsNVIDIAResearchamc-run-sample-calibration
run AMC sample dataset calibration
Jul 17Data AnalysisNVIDIATestingamc-run-video-calibration
calibrate video datasets with AutoMagicCalib
Jul 17AutomationImagingNVIDIAVideoamc-setup-calibration-stack
deploy AutoMagicCalib microservice with Docker
Jul 17DeploymentDockerNVIDIAOperations
More from NVIDIA
View publishernemoclaw-user-guide
retrieve NemoClaw documentation and configuration
NemoClaw
Jul 20DocumentationMCPSearchmcore-build-and-dependency
manage Megatron-LM development environments
Megatron-LM
Jul 14ContainersDeploymentPythonmcore-bump-base-image
update NVIDIA PyTorch base images
Megatron-LM
Jul 14CI/CDDeploymentmcore-cicd
manage CI/CD pipelines for Megatron-LM
Megatron-LM
Jul 14CI/CDDeploymentGitHubmcore-create-issue
investigate CI failures and create issues
Megatron-LM
Jul 14DebuggingGitHubTriagemcore-linting-and-formatting
lint and format Megatron-LM code
Megatron-LM
Jul 14Best PracticesCode Analysis