
Description
Guides C++ code toward modern idioms (C++20/23/26). Use when writing new C++ code, modernizing legacy patterns, or working on security-critical C++. Replaces raw pointers with smart pointers, SFINAE with concepts, printf with std::print, error codes with std::expected.
SKILL.md
Modern C++
Guide for writing modern C++ using C++20, C++23, and C++26 idioms. Focuses on patterns that eliminate vulnerability classes and reduce boilerplate, with a security emphasis from Trail of Bits.
When to Use This Skill
- Writing new C++ functions, classes, or libraries
- Modernizing existing C++ code (pre-C++20 patterns)
- Choosing between legacy and modern approaches
- Working on security-critical or safety-sensitive C++
- Reviewing C++ code for modern idiom adoption
When NOT to Use This Skill
- User explicitly requires older standard: Respect constraints (embedded, legacy ABI)
- Pure C code: This skill is C++-specific
- Build system questions: CMake, Meson, Bazel configuration is out of scope
- Non-C++ projects: Mixed codebases where C++ isn't primary
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
| Avoid | Use Instead | Why |
|---|---|---|
new/delete | std::make_unique, std::make_shared | Eliminates leaks, double-free |
| Raw owning pointers | std::unique_ptr, std::shared_ptr | RAII ownership semantics |
C arrays (int arr[N]) | std::array<int, N> | Bounds-aware, value semantics |
| Pointer + length params | std::span<T> | Non-owning, bounds-checkable |
printf / sprintf | std::format, std::print | Type-safe, no buffer overflow |
C-style casts (int)x | static_cast<int>(x) | Explicit intent, auditable |
#define constants | constexpr variables | Scoped, typed, debuggable |
SFINAE / enable_if | Concepts + requires | Readable constraints and errors |
| Error codes + out params | std::expected<T, E> | Composable, type-safe errors |
union | std::variant | Type-safe, no silent UB |
Raw mutex.lock()/unlock() | std::scoped_lock | Exception-safe, no deadlocks |
std::thread | std::jthread | Auto-join, stop token support |
assert() macro | contract_assert (C++26) | Visible to tooling, configurable |
| Manual CRTP | Deducing this (C++23) | Simpler, no template boilerplate |
| Macro code generation | Reflection (C++26) | Zero-overhead, composable |
See anti-patterns.md for the full table (30+ patterns).
Decision Tree
What are you doing?
|
+-- Writing new C++ code?
| +-- Use modern idioms by default (C++20/23)
| +-- Choose the newest standard your compiler supports
| +-- See Feature Tiers below
|
+-- Modernizing existing code?
| +-- Start with Tier 1 (C++20/23) replacements
| +-- Prioritize by security impact (memory > types > style)
| +-- See anti-patterns.md for the migration table
|
+-- Security-critical code?
| +-- Enable compiler hardening flags (see below)
| +-- Enable hardened libc++ mode
| +-- Run sanitizers in CI
| +-- See safe-idioms.md and compiler-hardening.md
|
+-- Using C++26 features?
+-- Reflection: YES, plan for it (GCC 16+)
+-- Contracts: cautiously, for new API boundaries
+-- std::execution: wait for ecosystem maturity
+-- See cpp26-features.md
Feature Tiers
Features are ranked by practical usability today, not by standard version.
Tier 1: Use Today (C++20/23, solid compiler support)
| Feature | Replaces | Standard |
|---|---|---|
Concepts + requires | SFINAE, enable_if | C++20 |
| Ranges + views | Raw iterator loops | C++20 |
std::span<T> | Pointer + length | C++20 |
std::format | sprintf, iostream chains | C++20 |
Three-way comparison <=> | Manual comparison operators | C++20 |
std::jthread | std::thread + manual join | C++20 |
| Designated initializers | Positional struct init | C++20 |
std::expected<T,E> | Error codes, exceptions at boundaries | C++23 |
std::print / std::println | printf, std::cout << | C++23 |
Deducing this | CRTP, const/non-const duplication | C++23 |
std::flat_map | std::map for read-heavy use | C++23 |
Monadic std::optional | Nested if-checks on optionals | C++23 |
See cpp20-features.md and cpp23-features.md.
Tier 2: Deploy Now (no standard bump needed)
These improve safety without changing your C++ standard version:
- Compiler hardening flags —
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3,-fstack-protector-strong,-ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero - Hardened libc++ —
-D_LIBCPP_HARDENING_MODE=_LIBCPP_HARDENING_MODE_FASTfor ~0.3% overhead bounds-checking - Sanitizers in CI — ASan + UBSan as minimum; TSan for concurrent code
- Warning flags —
-Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic -Werror
Tier 3: Plan For (C++26, worth restructuring around)
Reflection is the single most transformative C++26 feature. It eliminates:
- Serialization boilerplate (one generic function replaces per-struct
to_json) - Code generators (protobuf codegen, Qt MOC)
- Macro-based registration and enum-to-string hacks
GCC 16 (April 2026) has reflection merged. Plan new code to benefit from it.
Tier 4: Watch (C++26, needs maturation)
- Contracts (
pre/post/contract_assert) — Better thanassert(), but no virtual function support and limited compiler support. Adopt cautiously for new API boundaries. - std::execution (senders/receivers) — Powerful async framework, but steep learning curve, no scheduler ships with it, and poor documentation. Wait for ecosystem maturity.
See cpp26-features.md.
Compiler Hardening Quick Reference
Essential Flags (GCC + Clang)
-Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic -Werror
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3
-fstack-protector-strong
-fstack-clash-protection
-ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero
-fPIE -pie
-Wl,-z,relro,-z,now
Clang-Specific
-Wunsafe-buffer-usage
Hardened libc++ (Clang/libc++ only)
-D_LIBCPP_HARDENING_MODE=_LIBCPP_HARDENING_MODE_FAST
Google deployed this across Chrome and their server fleet: ~0.3% overhead, 1000+ bugs found, 30% reduction in production segfaults.
See compiler-hardening.md for the full guide.
Rationalizations to Reject
| Rationalization | Why It's Wrong |
|---|---|
| "It compiles without warnings" | Warnings depend on which flags you enable. Add -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic. |
| "ASan is too slow for production" | Use GWP-ASan for sampling-based production detection (~0% overhead). |
| "We only use safe containers" | Iterator invalidation and unchecked optional access are still exploitable. |
| "Smart pointers are slower" | std::unique_ptr has zero overhead vs raw pointers. Measure before claiming. |
| "Our code doesn't have memory bugs" | Google found 1000+ bugs when enabling hardened libc++. So did everyone else. |
| "C++26 features aren't available yet" | C++20/23 features are. Hardening flags work on any standard. Start there. |
| "Modern C++ is harder to read" | std::expected is more readable than checking error codes across 5 out-params. |
Best Practices Checklist
- Use smart pointers for ownership, raw pointers only for non-owning observation
- Prefer
std::spanover pointer + length for function parameters - Use
std::expectedfor functions that can fail with typed errors - Constrain templates with concepts, not SFINAE
- Enable compiler hardening flags and hardened libc++ in all builds
- Run ASan + UBSan in CI; add TSan for concurrent code
- Use
constexpr/constevalwhere possible (UB-free by design) - Mark functions
[[nodiscard]]when ignoring the return value is likely a bug - Prefer value semantics; use
std::variantoverunion,enum classoverenum - Initialize all variables at declaration
Read Next
- anti-patterns.md — Full legacy-to-modern migration table (30+ patterns)
- cpp20-features.md — Concepts, ranges, span, format, coroutines
- cpp23-features.md — expected, print, deducing this, flat_map
- cpp26-features.md — Reflection, contracts, memory safety improvements
- compiler-hardening.md — Flags, sanitizers, hardened libc++
- safe-idioms.md — Security patterns by vulnerability class
More skills from the skills repository
View all 77 skillsaddress-sanitizer
detect memory errors during fuzzing
Jul 17C#DebuggingSecurityTestingaflpp
perform multi-core fuzzing of C/C++ projects
Jul 17C#SecurityTestingagentic-actions-auditor
audit GitHub Actions for security vulnerabilities
Jul 18AgentsCI/CDCode AnalysisGitHub Actions +1algorand-vulnerability-scanner
scan Algorand smart contracts for vulnerabilities
Aug 21AuditCode AnalysisSecuritySmart Contractsatheris
fuzz Python code with Atheris
Aug 21PythonSecurityTestingaudit-augmentation
augment code graphs with audit findings
Aug 21AuditCode AnalysisSecurity
More from Trail of Bits
View publisheraudit-context-building
build architectural context for code analysis
skills
Aug 8ArchitectureAuditCode AnalysisEngineeringaudit-prep-assistant
prepare codebases for security audits
skills
Jul 18AuditCode AnalysisEngineeringSecurityburpsuite-project-parser
parse Burp Suite project files
skills
Jul 17AuditCLISecurityc-review
audit C and C++ code
skills
Aug 21AuditC#Code AnalysisSecuritycairo-vulnerability-scanner
scan Cairo and StarkNet contracts for vulnerabilities
skills
Aug 21AuditCode AnalysisSecuritySmart Contractscargo-fuzz
fuzz Rust projects with cargo-fuzz
skills
Jul 17EngineeringRustSecurityTesting