
Skill
role-definitions
configure model routing and fallback chains
Description
Detailed model routing role definitions, decision flowchart, model tier grid, and fallback chain best practices. Load when authoring agents or debugging model routing.
SKILL.md
Model Routing Role Definitions
Reference for choosing the right model_role when writing agent frontmatter or delegating to sub-agents. There are 13 roles organized into 5 categories.
Quick Decision Flowchart
What does your agent primarily DO?
│
├─ Writes code?
│ ├─ Frontend/UI code (components, layouts, CSS)? → ui-coding
│ ├─ Security vulnerability scanning? → security-audit
│ └─ General code (backend, IaC, tests, debugging)? → coding
│
├─ Thinks deeply / designs systems?
│ ├─ Designing architecture or solving complex problems? → reasoning
│ ├─ Reviewing/critiquing existing work for flaws? → critique
│ └─ Investigating and synthesizing from multiple sources? → research
│
├─ Creates content?
│ ├─ Aesthetic/design direction (visual, brand, style)? → creative
│ └─ Long-form writing (docs, marketing, case studies)? → writing
│
├─ Works with images?
│ ├─ Needs to understand/analyze images? → vision
│ └─ Needs to generate images? → image-gen
│
├─ Orchestrates high-stakes operations?
│ └─ Infrastructure, deployments, shadow environments? → critical-ops
│
├─ Quick utility task (parsing, classification, file ops)?
│ └─ → fast
│
└─ None of the above / genuinely varied work?
└─ → general
Role-by-Role Reference
Foundation Roles
These two roles are required in every matrix and serve as universal fallbacks.
general
- Description: Versatile catch-all, no specialization needed
- Model tier: Mid (Sonnet, gpt-5.5, Gemini Pro)
- When to use: The agent's work is genuinely varied — knowledge experts, ecosystem consultants, integration specialists
- When NOT to use: If you can name what the agent primarily does (codes, designs, reviews), use that role instead
- Example agents: explorer, foundation-expert, amplifier-expert, core-expert
- Example chains:
general(terminal — no fallback needed)
fast
- Description: Quick utility tasks — parsing, classification, file ops, bulk work
- Model tier: Cheap (Haiku, GPT luna, Gemini Flash)
- When to use: Well-defined, low-ambiguity, high-volume, or latency-sensitive tasks — file operations, git commands, notification triage, data extraction
- When NOT to use: If the agent needs judgment calls, synthesis, or quality prose
- Example agents: file-ops, git-ops, shell-exec, health-checker, triage-manager
- Example chains:
fast(terminal — fast agents rarely need fallback)
Coding Domain Roles
For agents whose primary output is code.
coding
- Description: Code generation, implementation, debugging
- Model tier: Mid, code-specialized (Sonnet, gpt-5.5, Gemini Pro)
- When to use: The agent writes, modifies, or debugs code as its primary activity — bug fixing, feature implementation, test writing, infrastructure-as-code
- When NOT to use: If the agent primarily reviews code (use
critique), designs UI layouts (useui-coding), or audits for vulnerabilities (usesecurity-audit) - Example agents: bug-hunter, modular-builder, test-coverage, python-dev, rust-dev
- Example chains:
[coding, general]
ui-coding
- Description: Frontend/UI code — components, layouts, styling, spatial reasoning
- Model tier: Mid, code-specialized (same as
codingtoday — will diverge as visually-tuned models emerge) - When to use: The agent builds user-facing interfaces — components, layouts, responsive design, CSS, accessibility
- When NOT to use: If the agent writes backend code that serves a frontend (use
coding). If it evaluates design aesthetics without writing code (usecreative) - Example agents: component-designer, layout-architect, responsive-strategist
- Example chains:
[ui-coding, coding, general]
security-audit
- Description: Vulnerability assessment, attack surface analysis, code auditing
- Model tier: Mid, code-specialized + high reasoning
- When to use: The agent examines code or systems for security vulnerabilities, reviews authentication flows, assesses attack surfaces
- When NOT to use: If the agent is doing general code review (use
critique). If it's implementing security features (usecoding) - Example agents: security-guardian
- Example chains:
[security-audit, critique, general]
Cognitive Mode Roles
For agents whose primary value is in HOW they think.
reasoning
- Description: Deep architectural reasoning, system design, complex multi-step analysis
- Model tier: Heavy (Opus, gpt-5.5-pro, Gemini Pro) with high reasoning effort
- When to use: The agent designs systems, plans architectures, breaks complex problems into steps, or needs extended chain-of-thought
- When NOT to use: If the agent evaluates existing work (use
critique), writes prose (usewriting), or generates creative concepts (usecreative) - Example agents: zen-architect, brainstormer, plan-writer, recipe-author
- Example chains:
[reasoning, general]
critique
- Description: Analytical evaluation — finding flaws in existing work, not generating solutions
- Model tier: Mid with extra-high reasoning effort
- When to use: The agent reviews, evaluates, or finds flaws in existing code, architecture, or plans
- When NOT to use: If the agent builds something new (use
reasoningorcoding). If it checks for security vulnerabilities specifically (usesecurity-audit) - Example agents: spec-reviewer, code-quality-reviewer, friction-detector
- Example chains:
[critique, reasoning, general]or[critique, general]
creative
- Description: Design direction, aesthetic judgment, high-quality creative output
- Model tier: Heavy (Opus, gpt-5.5, Gemini Pro)
- When to use: The agent makes aesthetic judgments, establishes design direction, creates visual concepts
- When NOT to use: If the agent writes long-form content (use
writing). If it writes UI code (useui-coding) - Example agents: art-director, style-curator, storyboard-writer, character-designer
- Example chains:
[creative, general]or[creative, writing, general]
writing
- Description: Long-form content — documentation, marketing, case studies, storytelling
- Model tier: Heavy (Opus, gpt-5.5, Gemini Pro)
- When to use: The agent produces sustained written content — documentation, blog posts, case studies, release notes
- When NOT to use: If the output is code with comments (use
coding). If the writing is short utility text (usefast) - Example agents: technical-writer, marketing-writer, release-manager
- Example chains:
[writing, creative, general]or[writing, general]
research
- Description: Deep investigation, information synthesis across multiple sources
- Model tier: Heavy (Opus, gpt-5.5-pro, Gemini Pro) with high reasoning effort
- When to use: The agent investigates and synthesizes from multiple sources. Extended context windows matter
- When NOT to use: If the agent designs based on what it already knows (use
reasoning) - Example agents: browser-researcher, story-researcher
- Example chains:
[research, general]
Capability Roles
For agents that need specific model capabilities beyond text.
vision
- Description: Understanding visual input — screenshots, diagrams, UI mockups
- Model tier: Mid, multimodal (Gemini Flash, Sonnet, gpt-5.5)
- When to use: The agent analyzes screenshots, reads diagrams, interprets UI mockups
- When NOT to use: If the agent generates images (use
image-gen). If it writes UI code without seeing existing UI (useui-coding) - Example agents: browser-operator, visual-documenter
- Example chains:
[vision, general]
image-gen
- Description: Image generation, visual mockup creation, visual ideation
- Model tier: Specialized (gemini-3-pro-image-preview) — sparse provider coverage
- When to use: The agent creates images — generating mockups, producing comic panels, visual prototypes
- When NOT to use: If the agent analyzes existing images (use
vision) - IMPORTANT: Always include a non-image-gen fallback. Google-only in most matrices today.
- Example agents: panel-artist, cover-artist
- Example chains:
[image-gen, creative, general](NEVERimage-genalone)
Operational Role
critical-ops
- Description: High-reliability operational tasks — infrastructure, orchestration, coordination where mistakes are costly
- Model tier: Heavy (Opus, gpt-5.5-pro, Gemini Pro)
- When to use: The agent orchestrates infrastructure, manages deployments, verifies shadow environments, or performs operational tasks where failures cascade
- When NOT to use: If the agent writes IaC as its primary activity (use
coding). If it does quick operational checks (usefast) - Example agents: setup-digital-twin, dtu-profile-builder, container-operator
- Example chains:
[critical-ops, coding, general]
Model Tier Grid
Every role maps to a unique (model-tier x reasoning-config) cell:
default reasoning high reasoning extra-high reasoning
┌──────────────────────┬──────────────────────┬──────────────────────┐
Heavy │ creative │ reasoning │ │
(Opus) │ writing │ research │ │
│ critical-ops │ │ │
├──────────────────────┼──────────────────────┼──────────────────────┤
Mid │ general coding │ security-audit │ critique │
(Sonnet) │ ui-coding │ │ │
├──────────────────────┤ │ │
Flash │ fast vision │ │ │
(Haiku) │ │ │ │
├──────────────────────┤ │ │
Specialized│ image-gen │ │ │
└──────────────────────┴──────────────────────┴──────────────────────┘
Fallback Chain Best Practices
- Every chain should end with
general(orfastfor utility agents) - Go specific → general:
[ui-coding, coding, general]not[general, ui-coding] - Sparse roles need fallbacks:
[image-gen, creative, general]— image-gen has limited provider coverage - Don't over-chain: 2-3 roles is typical. More than 4 suggests confusion about the agent's purpose
- Single role is fine when the agent's need is unambiguous:
fast,general,coding
More from Microsoft
View publisherrushstack-best-practices
manage Rush monorepos with best practices
rushstack
Apr 6EngineeringLocal DevelopmentMicrosoftProject Management +1azure-ai-agents-persistent-dotnet
build AI agents with Azure .NET SDK
skills
Jul 3.NETAgentsAzureLLMazure-ai-anomalydetector-java
build anomaly detection applications with Java
skills
May 13AnalyticsAzureData AnalysisJava +2azure-ai-contentsafety-java
build content moderation applications with Azure AI
skills
Jul 7AI InfrastructureAzureJavaSecurityazure-ai-contentsafety-py
detect harmful content with Azure AI Content Safety
skills
Jul 18AzureComplianceLLMMicrosoft +2azure-ai-language-conversations-py
implement conversational language understanding with Python
skills
Jul 18AnalyticsAzureLLMPython