Aave deleveraging

There are three ways to lift a health factor, and they cost the user different things. Compare them before recommending one.

Steps

1. Inspect — get_user_summary for the health factor, then get_user_positions for the debt and collateral by asset. Identify the largest debt and the collateral with the highest liquidation threshold.
2. Route A: repay from wallet — get_markets with user for the debt asset's wallet balance. If the wallet holds it, preview_action (action repay) at the amount that reaches the target health factor.
3. Route B: repay from collateral — on v4, get_repay_with_supply_quote for the debt against the collateral; it is atomic and the health factor never passes through a worse state. On v3 there is no atomic route: a withdraw → repay sequence dips the health factor between steps, and that must be said.
4. Route C: add collateral — preview_action (action supply, enableCollateral: true) for an asset the wallet holds.
5. Compare — one table: route, what the user gives up, health factor after, and what remains at risk. Recommend the route that reaches the target with the least the user must part with, and say why the others rank lower.

Rules

• Default target health factor is 1.5 unless the user names one. Below 1.1 is urgent: say so first, then compare routes.
• Every simulated route reports its healthFactorAfter; a route that cannot be simulated is described as unsimulated, not estimated.
• Build nothing until the user picks a route; then hand over to the safe-transactions skill for the build.

Done when

• Every route the position allows was simulated or quoted, with the health factor after.
• The answer says which route reaches the target with the least given up, and why.
• If the position is on v3, the answer says there is no atomic repay-from-collateral and names the health-factor dip.