[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill-anthropic-review-contract":3,"mdc--9ahnbd-key":34,"related-repo-anthropic-review-contract":1747,"related-org-anthropic-review-contract":1866},{"slug":4,"name":4,"fn":5,"description":6,"org":7,"tags":12,"stars":23,"repoUrl":24,"updatedAt":25,"license":26,"forks":27,"topics":28,"repo":29,"sourceUrl":32,"mdContent":33},"review-contract","review contracts and generate redlines","Review a contract against your organization's negotiation playbook — flag deviations, generate redlines, provide business impact analysis. Use when reviewing vendor or customer agreements, when you need clause-by-clause analysis against standard positions, or when preparing a negotiation strategy with prioritized redlines and fallback positions.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},"anthropic","Anthropic","https:\u002F\u002Fpexgzepcugksgbtrxkhf.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Forg-logos\u002Fanthropic.png","anthropics",[13,17,20],{"name":14,"slug":15,"type":16},"Contracts","contracts","tag",{"name":18,"slug":19,"type":16},"Negotiation","negotiation",{"name":21,"slug":22,"type":16},"Legal","legal",22885,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fanthropics\u002Fknowledge-work-plugins","2026-04-06T17:55:41.309841",null,2736,[],{"repoUrl":24,"stars":23,"forks":27,"topics":30,"description":31},[],"Open source repository of plugins primarily intended for knowledge workers to use in Claude Cowork","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fanthropics\u002Fknowledge-work-plugins\u002Ftree\u002FHEAD\u002Flegal\u002Fskills\u002Freview-contract","---\nname: review-contract\ndescription: Review a contract against your organization's negotiation playbook — flag deviations, generate redlines, provide business impact analysis. Use when reviewing vendor or customer agreements, when you need clause-by-clause analysis against standard positions, or when preparing a negotiation strategy with prioritized redlines and fallback positions.\nargument-hint: \"\u003Ccontract file or text>\"\n---\n\n# \u002Freview-contract -- Contract Review Against Playbook\n\n> If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](..\u002F..\u002FCONNECTORS.md).\n\nReview a contract against your organization's negotiation playbook. Analyze each clause, flag deviations, generate redline suggestions, and provide business impact analysis.\n\n**Important**: You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. All analysis should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals before being relied upon.\n\n## Invocation\n\n```\n\u002Freview-contract \u003Ccontract file or URL>\n```\n\nReview the contract: @$1\n\n## Workflow\n\n### Step 1: Accept the Contract\n\nAccept the contract in any of these formats:\n- **File upload**: PDF, DOCX, or other document format\n- **URL**: Link to a contract in your CLM, cloud storage (e.g., Box, Egnyte, SharePoint), or other document system\n- **Pasted text**: Contract text pasted directly into the conversation\n\nIf no contract is provided, prompt the user to supply one.\n\n### Step 2: Gather Context\n\nAsk the user for context before beginning the review:\n\n1. **Which side are you on?** (vendor\u002Fsupplier, customer\u002Fbuyer, licensor, licensee, partner -- or other)\n2. **Deadline**: When does this need to be finalized? (Affects prioritization of issues)\n3. **Focus areas**: Any specific concerns? (e.g., \"data protection is critical\", \"we need flexibility on term\", \"IP ownership is the key issue\")\n4. **Deal context**: Any relevant business context? (e.g., deal size, strategic importance, existing relationship)\n\nIf the user provides partial context, proceed with what you have and note assumptions.\n\n### Step 3: Load the Playbook\n\nLook for the organization's contract review playbook in local settings (e.g., `legal.local.md` or similar configuration files).\n\nThe playbook should define:\n- **Standard positions**: The organization's preferred terms for each major clause type\n- **Acceptable ranges**: Terms that can be agreed to without escalation\n- **Escalation triggers**: Terms that require senior counsel review or outside counsel involvement\n\n**If no playbook is configured:**\n- Inform the user that no playbook was found\n- Offer two options:\n  1. Help the user set up their playbook (walk through defining positions for key clauses)\n  2. Proceed with a generic review using widely-accepted commercial standards as the baseline\n- If proceeding generically, clearly note that the review is based on general commercial standards, not the organization's specific positions\n\n### Step 4: Clause-by-Clause Analysis\n\nApply the following review process:\n\n1. **Identify the contract type**: SaaS agreement, professional services, license, partnership, procurement, etc. The contract type affects which clauses are most material.\n2. **Determine the user's side**: Vendor, customer, licensor, licensee, partner. This fundamentally changes the analysis (e.g., limitation of liability protections favor different parties).\n3. **Read the entire contract** before flagging issues. Clauses interact with each other (e.g., an uncapped indemnity may be partially mitigated by a broad limitation of liability).\n4. **Analyze each material clause** against the playbook position.\n5. **Consider the contract holistically**: Are the overall risk allocation and commercial terms balanced?\n\nAnalyze the contract systematically, covering at minimum:\n\n| Clause Category | Key Review Points |\n|----------------|-------------------|\n| **Limitation of Liability** | Cap amount, carveouts, mutual vs. unilateral, consequential damages |\n| **Indemnification** | Scope, mutual vs. unilateral, cap, IP infringement, data breach |\n| **IP Ownership** | Pre-existing IP, developed IP, work-for-hire, license grants, assignment |\n| **Data Protection** | DPA requirement, processing terms, sub-processors, breach notification, cross-border transfers |\n| **Confidentiality** | Scope, term, carveouts, return\u002Fdestruction obligations |\n| **Representations & Warranties** | Scope, disclaimers, survival period |\n| **Term & Termination** | Duration, renewal, termination for convenience, termination for cause, wind-down |\n| **Governing Law & Dispute Resolution** | Jurisdiction, venue, arbitration vs. litigation |\n| **Insurance** | Coverage requirements, minimums, evidence of coverage |\n| **Assignment** | Consent requirements, change of control, exceptions |\n| **Force Majeure** | Scope, notification, termination rights |\n| **Payment Terms** | Net terms, late fees, taxes, price escalation |\n\nFor each clause, assess against the playbook (or generic standards) and note whether it is present, absent, or unusual.\n\n#### Detailed Clause Guidance\n\n##### Limitation of Liability\n\n**Key elements to review:**\n- Cap amount (fixed dollar amount, multiple of fees, or uncapped)\n- Whether the cap is mutual or applies differently to each party\n- Carveouts from the cap (what liabilities are uncapped)\n- Whether consequential, indirect, special, or punitive damages are excluded\n- Whether the exclusion is mutual\n- Carveouts from the consequential damages exclusion\n- Whether the cap applies per-claim, per-year, or aggregate\n\n**Common issues:**\n- Cap set at a fraction of fees paid (e.g., \"fees paid in the prior 3 months\" on a low-value contract)\n- Asymmetric carveouts favoring the drafter\n- Broad carveouts that effectively eliminate the cap (e.g., \"any breach of Section X\" where Section X covers most obligations)\n- No consequential damages exclusion for one party's breaches\n\n##### Indemnification\n\n**Key elements to review:**\n- Whether indemnification is mutual or unilateral\n- Scope: what triggers the indemnification obligation (IP infringement, data breach, bodily injury, breach of reps and warranties)\n- Whether indemnification is capped (often subject to the overall liability cap, or sometimes uncapped)\n- Procedure: notice requirements, right to control defense, right to settle\n- Whether the indemnitee must mitigate\n- Relationship between indemnification and the limitation of liability clause\n\n**Common issues:**\n- Unilateral indemnification for IP infringement when both parties contribute IP\n- Indemnification for \"any breach\" (too broad; essentially converts the liability cap to uncapped liability)\n- No right to control defense of claims\n- Indemnification obligations that survive termination indefinitely\n\n##### Intellectual Property\n\n**Key elements to review:**\n- Ownership of pre-existing IP (each party should retain their own)\n- Ownership of IP developed during the engagement\n- Work-for-hire provisions and their scope\n- License grants: scope, exclusivity, territory, sublicensing rights\n- Open source considerations\n- Feedback clauses (grants on suggestions or improvements)\n\n**Common issues:**\n- Broad IP assignment that could capture the customer's pre-existing IP\n- Work-for-hire provisions extending beyond the deliverables\n- Unrestricted feedback clauses granting perpetual, irrevocable licenses\n- License scope broader than needed for the business relationship\n\n##### Data Protection\n\n**Key elements to review:**\n- Whether a Data Processing Agreement\u002FAddendum (DPA) is required\n- Data controller vs. data processor classification\n- Sub-processor rights and notification obligations\n- Data breach notification timeline (72 hours for GDPR)\n- Cross-border data transfer mechanisms (SCCs, adequacy decisions, binding corporate rules)\n- Data deletion or return obligations on termination\n- Data security requirements and audit rights\n- Purpose limitation for data processing\n\n**Common issues:**\n- No DPA when personal data is being processed\n- Blanket authorization for sub-processors without notification\n- Breach notification timeline longer than regulatory requirements\n- No cross-border transfer protections when data moves internationally\n- Inadequate data deletion provisions\n\n##### Term and Termination\n\n**Key elements to review:**\n- Initial term and renewal terms\n- Auto-renewal provisions and notice periods\n- Termination for convenience: available? notice period? early termination fees?\n- Termination for cause: cure period? what constitutes cause?\n- Effects of termination: data return, transition assistance, survival clauses\n- Wind-down period and obligations\n\n**Common issues:**\n- Long initial terms with no termination for convenience\n- Auto-renewal with short notice windows (e.g., 30-day notice for annual renewal)\n- No cure period for termination for cause\n- Inadequate transition assistance provisions\n- Survival clauses that effectively extend the agreement indefinitely\n\n##### Governing Law and Dispute Resolution\n\n**Key elements to review:**\n- Choice of law (governing jurisdiction)\n- Dispute resolution mechanism (litigation, arbitration, mediation first)\n- Venue and jurisdiction for litigation\n- Arbitration rules and seat (if arbitration)\n- Jury waiver\n- Class action waiver\n- Prevailing party attorney's fees\n\n**Common issues:**\n- Unfavorable jurisdiction (unusual or remote venue)\n- Mandatory arbitration with rules favorable to the drafter\n- Waiver of jury trial without corresponding protections\n- No escalation process before formal dispute resolution\n\n### Step 5: Flag Deviations\n\nClassify each deviation from the playbook using a three-tier system:\n\n#### GREEN -- Acceptable\n\nThe clause aligns with or is better than the organization's standard position. Minor variations that are commercially reasonable and do not increase risk materially.\n\n**Examples:**\n- Liability cap at 18 months of fees when standard is 12 months (better for the customer)\n- Mutual NDA term of 2 years when standard is 3 years (shorter but reasonable)\n- Governing law in a well-established commercial jurisdiction close to the preferred one\n\n**Action**: Note for awareness. No negotiation needed.\n\n#### YELLOW -- Negotiate\n\nThe clause falls outside the standard position but within a negotiable range. The term is common in the market but not the organization's preference. Requires attention and likely negotiation, but not escalation.\n\n**Examples:**\n- Liability cap at 6 months of fees when standard is 12 months (below standard but negotiable)\n- Unilateral indemnification for IP infringement when standard is mutual (common market position but not preferred)\n- Auto-renewal with 60-day notice when standard is 90 days\n- Governing law in an acceptable but not preferred jurisdiction\n\n**Action**: Generate specific redline language. Provide fallback position. Estimate business impact of accepting vs. negotiating.\n- **Include**: Specific redline language to bring the term back to standard position\n- **Include**: Fallback position if the counterparty pushes back\n- **Include**: Business impact of accepting as-is vs. negotiating\n\n#### RED -- Escalate\n\nThe clause falls outside acceptable range, triggers a defined escalation criterion, or poses material risk. Requires senior counsel review, outside counsel involvement, or business decision-maker sign-off.\n\n**Examples:**\n- Uncapped liability or no limitation of liability clause\n- Unilateral broad indemnification with no cap\n- IP assignment of pre-existing IP\n- No DPA offered when personal data is processed\n- Unreasonable non-compete or exclusivity provisions\n- Governing law in a problematic jurisdiction with mandatory arbitration\n\n**Action**: Explain the specific risk. Provide market-standard alternative language. Estimate exposure. Recommend escalation path.\n- **Include**: Why this is a RED flag (specific risk)\n- **Include**: What the standard market position looks like\n- **Include**: Business impact and potential exposure\n- **Include**: Recommended escalation path\n\n### Step 6: Generate Redline Suggestions\n\nFor each YELLOW and RED deviation, provide:\n- **Current language**: Quote the relevant contract text\n- **Suggested redline**: Specific alternative language\n- **Rationale**: Brief explanation suitable for sharing with the counterparty\n- **Priority**: Whether this is a must-have or nice-to-have in negotiation\n\n#### Redline Generation Best Practices\n\nWhen generating redline suggestions:\n\n1. **Be specific**: Provide exact language, not vague guidance. The redline should be ready to insert.\n2. **Be balanced**: Propose language that is firm on critical points but commercially reasonable. Overly aggressive redlines slow negotiations.\n3. **Explain the rationale**: Include a brief, professional rationale suitable for sharing with the counterparty's counsel.\n4. **Provide fallback positions**: For YELLOW items, include a fallback position if the primary ask is rejected.\n5. **Prioritize**: Not all redlines are equal. Indicate which are must-haves and which are nice-to-haves.\n6. **Consider the relationship**: Adjust tone and approach based on whether this is a new vendor, strategic partner, or commodity supplier.\n\n#### Redline Format\n\nFor each redline:\n```\n**Clause**: [Section reference and clause name]\n**Current language**: \"[exact quote from the contract]\"\n**Proposed redline**: \"[specific alternative language with additions in bold and deletions struck through conceptually]\"\n**Rationale**: [1-2 sentences explaining why, suitable for external sharing]\n**Priority**: [Must-have \u002F Should-have \u002F Nice-to-have]\n**Fallback**: [Alternative position if primary redline is rejected]\n```\n\n### Step 7: Business Impact Summary\n\nProvide a summary section covering:\n- **Overall risk assessment**: High-level view of the contract's risk profile\n- **Top 3 issues**: The most important items to address\n- **Negotiation strategy**: Recommended approach (which issues to lead with, what to concede)\n- **Timeline considerations**: Any urgency factors affecting the negotiation approach\n\n#### Negotiation Priority Framework\n\nWhen presenting redlines, organize by negotiation priority:\n\n**Tier 1 -- Must-Haves (Deal Breakers)**\nIssues where the organization cannot proceed without resolution:\n- Uncapped or materially insufficient liability protections\n- Missing data protection requirements for regulated data\n- IP provisions that could jeopardize core assets\n- Terms that conflict with regulatory obligations\n\n**Tier 2 -- Should-Haves (Strong Preferences)**\nIssues that materially affect risk but have negotiation room:\n- Liability cap adjustments within range\n- Indemnification scope and mutuality\n- Termination flexibility\n- Audit and compliance rights\n\n**Tier 3 -- Nice-to-Haves (Concession Candidates)**\nIssues that improve the position but can be conceded strategically:\n- Preferred governing law (if alternative is acceptable)\n- Notice period preferences\n- Minor definitional improvements\n- Insurance certificate requirements\n\n**Negotiation strategy**: Lead with Tier 1 items. Trade Tier 3 concessions to secure Tier 2 wins. Never concede on Tier 1 without escalation.\n\n### Step 8: CLM Routing (If Connected)\n\nIf a Contract Lifecycle Management system is connected via MCP:\n- Recommend the appropriate approval workflow based on contract type and risk level\n- Suggest the correct routing path (e.g., standard approval, senior counsel, outside counsel)\n- Note any required approvals based on contract value or risk flags\n\nIf no CLM is connected, skip this step.\n\n## Output Format\n\nStructure the output as:\n\n```\n## Contract Review Summary\n\n**Document**: [contract name\u002Fidentifier]\n**Parties**: [party names and roles]\n**Your Side**: [vendor\u002Fcustomer\u002Fetc.]\n**Deadline**: [if provided]\n**Review Basis**: [Playbook \u002F Generic Standards]\n\n## Key Findings\n\n[Top 3-5 issues with severity flags]\n\n## Clause-by-Clause Analysis\n\n### [Clause Category] -- [GREEN\u002FYELLOW\u002FRED]\n**Contract says**: [summary of the provision]\n**Playbook position**: [your standard]\n**Deviation**: [description of gap]\n**Business impact**: [what this means practically]\n**Redline suggestion**: [specific language, if YELLOW or RED]\n\n[Repeat for each major clause]\n\n## Negotiation Strategy\n\n[Recommended approach, priorities, concession candidates]\n\n## Next Steps\n\n[Specific actions to take]\n```\n\n## Notes\n\n- If the contract is in a language other than English, note this and ask if the user wants a translation or review in the original language\n- For very long contracts (50+ pages), offer to focus on the most material sections first and then do a complete review\n- Always remind the user that this analysis should be reviewed by qualified legal counsel before being relied upon for legal decisions\n",{"data":35,"body":37},{"name":4,"description":6,"argument-hint":36},"\u003Ccontract file or text>",{"type":38,"children":39},"root",[40,49,68,73,84,91,104,109,115,122,127,162,167,173,178,222,227,233,246,251,284,292,323,329,334,387,392,612,617,624,630,638,676,684,707,712,719,752,759,782,788,795,828,835,858,863,870,913,920,948,954,961,994,1001,1029,1035,1042,1080,1087,1110,1116,1121,1127,1132,1140,1158,1168,1174,1179,1186,1209,1218,1249,1255,1260,1267,1300,1309,1348,1354,1359,1402,1408,1413,1476,1482,1487,1496,1502,1507,1550,1556,1561,1571,1594,1604,1627,1637,1660,1669,1675,1680,1698,1703,1709,1714,1723,1729],{"type":41,"tag":42,"props":43,"children":45},"element","h1",{"id":44},"review-contract-contract-review-against-playbook",[46],{"type":47,"value":48},"text","\u002Freview-contract -- Contract Review Against Playbook",{"type":41,"tag":50,"props":51,"children":52},"blockquote",{},[53],{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":55,"children":56},"p",{},[57,59,66],{"type":47,"value":58},"If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see ",{"type":41,"tag":60,"props":61,"children":63},"a",{"href":62},"..\u002F..\u002FCONNECTORS.md",[64],{"type":47,"value":65},"CONNECTORS.md",{"type":47,"value":67},".",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":69,"children":70},{},[71],{"type":47,"value":72},"Review a contract against your organization's negotiation playbook. Analyze each clause, flag deviations, generate redline suggestions, and provide business impact analysis.",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":74,"children":75},{},[76,82],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":78,"children":79},"strong",{},[80],{"type":47,"value":81},"Important",{"type":47,"value":83},": You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. All analysis should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals before being relied upon.",{"type":41,"tag":85,"props":86,"children":88},"h2",{"id":87},"invocation",[89],{"type":47,"value":90},"Invocation",{"type":41,"tag":92,"props":93,"children":97},"pre",{"className":94,"code":96,"language":47},[95],"language-text","\u002Freview-contract \u003Ccontract file or URL>\n",[98],{"type":41,"tag":99,"props":100,"children":102},"code",{"__ignoreMap":101},"",[103],{"type":47,"value":96},{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":105,"children":106},{},[107],{"type":47,"value":108},"Review the contract: @$1",{"type":41,"tag":85,"props":110,"children":112},{"id":111},"workflow",[113],{"type":47,"value":114},"Workflow",{"type":41,"tag":116,"props":117,"children":119},"h3",{"id":118},"step-1-accept-the-contract",[120],{"type":47,"value":121},"Step 1: Accept the Contract",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":123,"children":124},{},[125],{"type":47,"value":126},"Accept the contract in any of these formats:",{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":129,"children":130},"ul",{},[131,142,152],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":133,"children":134},"li",{},[135,140],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":136,"children":137},{},[138],{"type":47,"value":139},"File upload",{"type":47,"value":141},": PDF, DOCX, or other document format",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":143,"children":144},{},[145,150],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":146,"children":147},{},[148],{"type":47,"value":149},"URL",{"type":47,"value":151},": Link to a contract in your CLM, cloud storage (e.g., Box, Egnyte, SharePoint), or other document system",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":153,"children":154},{},[155,160],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":156,"children":157},{},[158],{"type":47,"value":159},"Pasted text",{"type":47,"value":161},": Contract text pasted directly into the conversation",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":163,"children":164},{},[165],{"type":47,"value":166},"If no contract is provided, prompt the user to supply one.",{"type":41,"tag":116,"props":168,"children":170},{"id":169},"step-2-gather-context",[171],{"type":47,"value":172},"Step 2: Gather Context",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":174,"children":175},{},[176],{"type":47,"value":177},"Ask the user for context before beginning the review:",{"type":41,"tag":179,"props":180,"children":181},"ol",{},[182,192,202,212],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":183,"children":184},{},[185,190],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":186,"children":187},{},[188],{"type":47,"value":189},"Which side are you on?",{"type":47,"value":191}," (vendor\u002Fsupplier, customer\u002Fbuyer, licensor, licensee, partner -- or other)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":193,"children":194},{},[195,200],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":196,"children":197},{},[198],{"type":47,"value":199},"Deadline",{"type":47,"value":201},": When does this need to be finalized? (Affects prioritization of issues)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":203,"children":204},{},[205,210],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":206,"children":207},{},[208],{"type":47,"value":209},"Focus areas",{"type":47,"value":211},": Any specific concerns? (e.g., \"data protection is critical\", \"we need flexibility on term\", \"IP ownership is the key issue\")",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":213,"children":214},{},[215,220],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":216,"children":217},{},[218],{"type":47,"value":219},"Deal context",{"type":47,"value":221},": Any relevant business context? (e.g., deal size, strategic importance, existing relationship)",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":223,"children":224},{},[225],{"type":47,"value":226},"If the user provides partial context, proceed with what you have and note assumptions.",{"type":41,"tag":116,"props":228,"children":230},{"id":229},"step-3-load-the-playbook",[231],{"type":47,"value":232},"Step 3: Load the Playbook",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":234,"children":235},{},[236,238,244],{"type":47,"value":237},"Look for the organization's contract review playbook in local settings (e.g., ",{"type":41,"tag":99,"props":239,"children":241},{"className":240},[],[242],{"type":47,"value":243},"legal.local.md",{"type":47,"value":245}," or similar configuration files).",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":247,"children":248},{},[249],{"type":47,"value":250},"The playbook should define:",{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":252,"children":253},{},[254,264,274],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":255,"children":256},{},[257,262],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":258,"children":259},{},[260],{"type":47,"value":261},"Standard positions",{"type":47,"value":263},": The organization's preferred terms for each major clause type",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":265,"children":266},{},[267,272],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":268,"children":269},{},[270],{"type":47,"value":271},"Acceptable ranges",{"type":47,"value":273},": Terms that can be agreed to without escalation",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":275,"children":276},{},[277,282],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":278,"children":279},{},[280],{"type":47,"value":281},"Escalation triggers",{"type":47,"value":283},": Terms that require senior counsel review or outside counsel involvement",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":285,"children":286},{},[287],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":288,"children":289},{},[290],{"type":47,"value":291},"If no playbook is configured:",{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":293,"children":294},{},[295,300,318],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":296,"children":297},{},[298],{"type":47,"value":299},"Inform the user that no playbook was found",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":301,"children":302},{},[303,305],{"type":47,"value":304},"Offer two options:\n",{"type":41,"tag":179,"props":306,"children":307},{},[308,313],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":309,"children":310},{},[311],{"type":47,"value":312},"Help the user set up their playbook (walk through defining positions for key clauses)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":314,"children":315},{},[316],{"type":47,"value":317},"Proceed with a generic review using widely-accepted commercial standards as the baseline",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":319,"children":320},{},[321],{"type":47,"value":322},"If proceeding generically, clearly note that the review is based on general commercial standards, not the organization's specific positions",{"type":41,"tag":116,"props":324,"children":326},{"id":325},"step-4-clause-by-clause-analysis",[327],{"type":47,"value":328},"Step 4: Clause-by-Clause Analysis",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":330,"children":331},{},[332],{"type":47,"value":333},"Apply the following review process:",{"type":41,"tag":179,"props":335,"children":336},{},[337,347,357,367,377],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":338,"children":339},{},[340,345],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":341,"children":342},{},[343],{"type":47,"value":344},"Identify the contract type",{"type":47,"value":346},": SaaS agreement, professional services, license, partnership, procurement, etc. The contract type affects which clauses are most material.",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":348,"children":349},{},[350,355],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":351,"children":352},{},[353],{"type":47,"value":354},"Determine the user's side",{"type":47,"value":356},": Vendor, customer, licensor, licensee, partner. This fundamentally changes the analysis (e.g., limitation of liability protections favor different parties).",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":358,"children":359},{},[360,365],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":361,"children":362},{},[363],{"type":47,"value":364},"Read the entire contract",{"type":47,"value":366}," before flagging issues. Clauses interact with each other (e.g., an uncapped indemnity may be partially mitigated by a broad limitation of liability).",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":368,"children":369},{},[370,375],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":371,"children":372},{},[373],{"type":47,"value":374},"Analyze each material clause",{"type":47,"value":376}," against the playbook position.",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":378,"children":379},{},[380,385],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":381,"children":382},{},[383],{"type":47,"value":384},"Consider the contract holistically",{"type":47,"value":386},": Are the overall risk allocation and commercial terms balanced?",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":388,"children":389},{},[390],{"type":47,"value":391},"Analyze the contract systematically, covering at minimum:",{"type":41,"tag":393,"props":394,"children":395},"table",{},[396,415],{"type":41,"tag":397,"props":398,"children":399},"thead",{},[400],{"type":41,"tag":401,"props":402,"children":403},"tr",{},[404,410],{"type":41,"tag":405,"props":406,"children":407},"th",{},[408],{"type":47,"value":409},"Clause Category",{"type":41,"tag":405,"props":411,"children":412},{},[413],{"type":47,"value":414},"Key Review Points",{"type":41,"tag":416,"props":417,"children":418},"tbody",{},[419,436,452,468,484,500,516,532,548,564,580,596],{"type":41,"tag":401,"props":420,"children":421},{},[422,431],{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":424,"children":425},"td",{},[426],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":427,"children":428},{},[429],{"type":47,"value":430},"Limitation of Liability",{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":432,"children":433},{},[434],{"type":47,"value":435},"Cap amount, carveouts, mutual vs. unilateral, consequential damages",{"type":41,"tag":401,"props":437,"children":438},{},[439,447],{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":440,"children":441},{},[442],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":443,"children":444},{},[445],{"type":47,"value":446},"Indemnification",{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":448,"children":449},{},[450],{"type":47,"value":451},"Scope, mutual vs. unilateral, cap, IP infringement, data breach",{"type":41,"tag":401,"props":453,"children":454},{},[455,463],{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":456,"children":457},{},[458],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":459,"children":460},{},[461],{"type":47,"value":462},"IP Ownership",{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":464,"children":465},{},[466],{"type":47,"value":467},"Pre-existing IP, developed IP, work-for-hire, license grants, assignment",{"type":41,"tag":401,"props":469,"children":470},{},[471,479],{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":472,"children":473},{},[474],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":475,"children":476},{},[477],{"type":47,"value":478},"Data Protection",{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":480,"children":481},{},[482],{"type":47,"value":483},"DPA requirement, processing terms, sub-processors, breach notification, cross-border transfers",{"type":41,"tag":401,"props":485,"children":486},{},[487,495],{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":488,"children":489},{},[490],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":491,"children":492},{},[493],{"type":47,"value":494},"Confidentiality",{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":496,"children":497},{},[498],{"type":47,"value":499},"Scope, term, carveouts, return\u002Fdestruction obligations",{"type":41,"tag":401,"props":501,"children":502},{},[503,511],{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":504,"children":505},{},[506],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":507,"children":508},{},[509],{"type":47,"value":510},"Representations & Warranties",{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":512,"children":513},{},[514],{"type":47,"value":515},"Scope, disclaimers, survival period",{"type":41,"tag":401,"props":517,"children":518},{},[519,527],{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":520,"children":521},{},[522],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":523,"children":524},{},[525],{"type":47,"value":526},"Term & Termination",{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":528,"children":529},{},[530],{"type":47,"value":531},"Duration, renewal, termination for convenience, termination for cause, wind-down",{"type":41,"tag":401,"props":533,"children":534},{},[535,543],{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":536,"children":537},{},[538],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":539,"children":540},{},[541],{"type":47,"value":542},"Governing Law & Dispute Resolution",{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":544,"children":545},{},[546],{"type":47,"value":547},"Jurisdiction, venue, arbitration vs. litigation",{"type":41,"tag":401,"props":549,"children":550},{},[551,559],{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":552,"children":553},{},[554],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":555,"children":556},{},[557],{"type":47,"value":558},"Insurance",{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":560,"children":561},{},[562],{"type":47,"value":563},"Coverage requirements, minimums, evidence of coverage",{"type":41,"tag":401,"props":565,"children":566},{},[567,575],{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":568,"children":569},{},[570],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":571,"children":572},{},[573],{"type":47,"value":574},"Assignment",{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":576,"children":577},{},[578],{"type":47,"value":579},"Consent requirements, change of control, exceptions",{"type":41,"tag":401,"props":581,"children":582},{},[583,591],{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":584,"children":585},{},[586],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":587,"children":588},{},[589],{"type":47,"value":590},"Force Majeure",{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":592,"children":593},{},[594],{"type":47,"value":595},"Scope, notification, termination rights",{"type":41,"tag":401,"props":597,"children":598},{},[599,607],{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":600,"children":601},{},[602],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":603,"children":604},{},[605],{"type":47,"value":606},"Payment Terms",{"type":41,"tag":423,"props":608,"children":609},{},[610],{"type":47,"value":611},"Net terms, late fees, taxes, price escalation",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":613,"children":614},{},[615],{"type":47,"value":616},"For each clause, assess against the playbook (or generic standards) and note whether it is present, absent, or unusual.",{"type":41,"tag":618,"props":619,"children":621},"h4",{"id":620},"detailed-clause-guidance",[622],{"type":47,"value":623},"Detailed Clause Guidance",{"type":41,"tag":625,"props":626,"children":628},"h5",{"id":627},"limitation-of-liability",[629],{"type":47,"value":430},{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":631,"children":632},{},[633],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":634,"children":635},{},[636],{"type":47,"value":637},"Key elements to review:",{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":639,"children":640},{},[641,646,651,656,661,666,671],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":642,"children":643},{},[644],{"type":47,"value":645},"Cap amount (fixed dollar amount, multiple of fees, or uncapped)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":647,"children":648},{},[649],{"type":47,"value":650},"Whether the cap is mutual or applies differently to each party",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":652,"children":653},{},[654],{"type":47,"value":655},"Carveouts from the cap (what liabilities are uncapped)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":657,"children":658},{},[659],{"type":47,"value":660},"Whether consequential, indirect, special, or punitive damages are excluded",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":662,"children":663},{},[664],{"type":47,"value":665},"Whether the exclusion is mutual",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":667,"children":668},{},[669],{"type":47,"value":670},"Carveouts from the consequential damages exclusion",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":672,"children":673},{},[674],{"type":47,"value":675},"Whether the cap applies per-claim, per-year, or aggregate",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":677,"children":678},{},[679],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":680,"children":681},{},[682],{"type":47,"value":683},"Common issues:",{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":685,"children":686},{},[687,692,697,702],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":688,"children":689},{},[690],{"type":47,"value":691},"Cap set at a fraction of fees paid (e.g., \"fees paid in the prior 3 months\" on a low-value contract)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":693,"children":694},{},[695],{"type":47,"value":696},"Asymmetric carveouts favoring the drafter",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":698,"children":699},{},[700],{"type":47,"value":701},"Broad carveouts that effectively eliminate the cap (e.g., \"any breach of Section X\" where Section X covers most obligations)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":703,"children":704},{},[705],{"type":47,"value":706},"No consequential damages exclusion for one party's breaches",{"type":41,"tag":625,"props":708,"children":710},{"id":709},"indemnification",[711],{"type":47,"value":446},{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":713,"children":714},{},[715],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":716,"children":717},{},[718],{"type":47,"value":637},{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":720,"children":721},{},[722,727,732,737,742,747],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":723,"children":724},{},[725],{"type":47,"value":726},"Whether indemnification is mutual or unilateral",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":728,"children":729},{},[730],{"type":47,"value":731},"Scope: what triggers the indemnification obligation (IP infringement, data breach, bodily injury, breach of reps and warranties)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":733,"children":734},{},[735],{"type":47,"value":736},"Whether indemnification is capped (often subject to the overall liability cap, or sometimes uncapped)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":738,"children":739},{},[740],{"type":47,"value":741},"Procedure: notice requirements, right to control defense, right to settle",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":743,"children":744},{},[745],{"type":47,"value":746},"Whether the indemnitee must mitigate",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":748,"children":749},{},[750],{"type":47,"value":751},"Relationship between indemnification and the limitation of liability clause",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":753,"children":754},{},[755],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":756,"children":757},{},[758],{"type":47,"value":683},{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":760,"children":761},{},[762,767,772,777],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":763,"children":764},{},[765],{"type":47,"value":766},"Unilateral indemnification for IP infringement when both parties contribute IP",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":768,"children":769},{},[770],{"type":47,"value":771},"Indemnification for \"any breach\" (too broad; essentially converts the liability cap to uncapped liability)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":773,"children":774},{},[775],{"type":47,"value":776},"No right to control defense of claims",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":778,"children":779},{},[780],{"type":47,"value":781},"Indemnification obligations that survive termination indefinitely",{"type":41,"tag":625,"props":783,"children":785},{"id":784},"intellectual-property",[786],{"type":47,"value":787},"Intellectual Property",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":789,"children":790},{},[791],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":792,"children":793},{},[794],{"type":47,"value":637},{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":796,"children":797},{},[798,803,808,813,818,823],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":799,"children":800},{},[801],{"type":47,"value":802},"Ownership of pre-existing IP (each party should retain their own)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":804,"children":805},{},[806],{"type":47,"value":807},"Ownership of IP developed during the engagement",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":809,"children":810},{},[811],{"type":47,"value":812},"Work-for-hire provisions and their scope",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":814,"children":815},{},[816],{"type":47,"value":817},"License grants: scope, exclusivity, territory, sublicensing rights",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":819,"children":820},{},[821],{"type":47,"value":822},"Open source considerations",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":824,"children":825},{},[826],{"type":47,"value":827},"Feedback clauses (grants on suggestions or improvements)",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":829,"children":830},{},[831],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":832,"children":833},{},[834],{"type":47,"value":683},{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":836,"children":837},{},[838,843,848,853],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":839,"children":840},{},[841],{"type":47,"value":842},"Broad IP assignment that could capture the customer's pre-existing IP",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":844,"children":845},{},[846],{"type":47,"value":847},"Work-for-hire provisions extending beyond the deliverables",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":849,"children":850},{},[851],{"type":47,"value":852},"Unrestricted feedback clauses granting perpetual, irrevocable licenses",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":854,"children":855},{},[856],{"type":47,"value":857},"License scope broader than needed for the business relationship",{"type":41,"tag":625,"props":859,"children":861},{"id":860},"data-protection",[862],{"type":47,"value":478},{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":864,"children":865},{},[866],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":867,"children":868},{},[869],{"type":47,"value":637},{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":871,"children":872},{},[873,878,883,888,893,898,903,908],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":874,"children":875},{},[876],{"type":47,"value":877},"Whether a Data Processing Agreement\u002FAddendum (DPA) is required",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":879,"children":880},{},[881],{"type":47,"value":882},"Data controller vs. data processor classification",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":884,"children":885},{},[886],{"type":47,"value":887},"Sub-processor rights and notification obligations",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":889,"children":890},{},[891],{"type":47,"value":892},"Data breach notification timeline (72 hours for GDPR)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":894,"children":895},{},[896],{"type":47,"value":897},"Cross-border data transfer mechanisms (SCCs, adequacy decisions, binding corporate rules)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":899,"children":900},{},[901],{"type":47,"value":902},"Data deletion or return obligations on termination",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":904,"children":905},{},[906],{"type":47,"value":907},"Data security requirements and audit rights",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":909,"children":910},{},[911],{"type":47,"value":912},"Purpose limitation for data processing",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":914,"children":915},{},[916],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":917,"children":918},{},[919],{"type":47,"value":683},{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":921,"children":922},{},[923,928,933,938,943],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":924,"children":925},{},[926],{"type":47,"value":927},"No DPA when personal data is being processed",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":929,"children":930},{},[931],{"type":47,"value":932},"Blanket authorization for sub-processors without notification",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":934,"children":935},{},[936],{"type":47,"value":937},"Breach notification timeline longer than regulatory requirements",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":939,"children":940},{},[941],{"type":47,"value":942},"No cross-border transfer protections when data moves internationally",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":944,"children":945},{},[946],{"type":47,"value":947},"Inadequate data deletion provisions",{"type":41,"tag":625,"props":949,"children":951},{"id":950},"term-and-termination",[952],{"type":47,"value":953},"Term and Termination",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":955,"children":956},{},[957],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":958,"children":959},{},[960],{"type":47,"value":637},{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":962,"children":963},{},[964,969,974,979,984,989],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":965,"children":966},{},[967],{"type":47,"value":968},"Initial term and renewal terms",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":970,"children":971},{},[972],{"type":47,"value":973},"Auto-renewal provisions and notice periods",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":975,"children":976},{},[977],{"type":47,"value":978},"Termination for convenience: available? notice period? early termination fees?",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":980,"children":981},{},[982],{"type":47,"value":983},"Termination for cause: cure period? what constitutes cause?",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":985,"children":986},{},[987],{"type":47,"value":988},"Effects of termination: data return, transition assistance, survival clauses",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":990,"children":991},{},[992],{"type":47,"value":993},"Wind-down period and obligations",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":995,"children":996},{},[997],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":998,"children":999},{},[1000],{"type":47,"value":683},{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":1002,"children":1003},{},[1004,1009,1014,1019,1024],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1005,"children":1006},{},[1007],{"type":47,"value":1008},"Long initial terms with no termination for convenience",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1010,"children":1011},{},[1012],{"type":47,"value":1013},"Auto-renewal with short notice windows (e.g., 30-day notice for annual renewal)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1015,"children":1016},{},[1017],{"type":47,"value":1018},"No cure period for termination for cause",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1020,"children":1021},{},[1022],{"type":47,"value":1023},"Inadequate transition assistance provisions",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1025,"children":1026},{},[1027],{"type":47,"value":1028},"Survival clauses that effectively extend the agreement indefinitely",{"type":41,"tag":625,"props":1030,"children":1032},{"id":1031},"governing-law-and-dispute-resolution",[1033],{"type":47,"value":1034},"Governing Law and Dispute Resolution",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1036,"children":1037},{},[1038],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1039,"children":1040},{},[1041],{"type":47,"value":637},{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":1043,"children":1044},{},[1045,1050,1055,1060,1065,1070,1075],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1046,"children":1047},{},[1048],{"type":47,"value":1049},"Choice of law (governing jurisdiction)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1051,"children":1052},{},[1053],{"type":47,"value":1054},"Dispute resolution mechanism (litigation, arbitration, mediation first)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1056,"children":1057},{},[1058],{"type":47,"value":1059},"Venue and jurisdiction for litigation",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1061,"children":1062},{},[1063],{"type":47,"value":1064},"Arbitration rules and seat (if arbitration)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1066,"children":1067},{},[1068],{"type":47,"value":1069},"Jury waiver",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1071,"children":1072},{},[1073],{"type":47,"value":1074},"Class action waiver",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1076,"children":1077},{},[1078],{"type":47,"value":1079},"Prevailing party attorney's fees",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1081,"children":1082},{},[1083],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1084,"children":1085},{},[1086],{"type":47,"value":683},{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":1088,"children":1089},{},[1090,1095,1100,1105],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1091,"children":1092},{},[1093],{"type":47,"value":1094},"Unfavorable jurisdiction (unusual or remote venue)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1096,"children":1097},{},[1098],{"type":47,"value":1099},"Mandatory arbitration with rules favorable to the drafter",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1101,"children":1102},{},[1103],{"type":47,"value":1104},"Waiver of jury trial without corresponding protections",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1106,"children":1107},{},[1108],{"type":47,"value":1109},"No escalation process before formal dispute resolution",{"type":41,"tag":116,"props":1111,"children":1113},{"id":1112},"step-5-flag-deviations",[1114],{"type":47,"value":1115},"Step 5: Flag Deviations",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1117,"children":1118},{},[1119],{"type":47,"value":1120},"Classify each deviation from the playbook using a three-tier system:",{"type":41,"tag":618,"props":1122,"children":1124},{"id":1123},"green-acceptable",[1125],{"type":47,"value":1126},"GREEN -- Acceptable",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1128,"children":1129},{},[1130],{"type":47,"value":1131},"The clause aligns with or is better than the organization's standard position. Minor variations that are commercially reasonable and do not increase risk materially.",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1133,"children":1134},{},[1135],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1136,"children":1137},{},[1138],{"type":47,"value":1139},"Examples:",{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":1141,"children":1142},{},[1143,1148,1153],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1144,"children":1145},{},[1146],{"type":47,"value":1147},"Liability cap at 18 months of fees when standard is 12 months (better for the customer)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1149,"children":1150},{},[1151],{"type":47,"value":1152},"Mutual NDA term of 2 years when standard is 3 years (shorter but reasonable)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1154,"children":1155},{},[1156],{"type":47,"value":1157},"Governing law in a well-established commercial jurisdiction close to the preferred one",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1159,"children":1160},{},[1161,1166],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1162,"children":1163},{},[1164],{"type":47,"value":1165},"Action",{"type":47,"value":1167},": Note for awareness. No negotiation needed.",{"type":41,"tag":618,"props":1169,"children":1171},{"id":1170},"yellow-negotiate",[1172],{"type":47,"value":1173},"YELLOW -- Negotiate",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1175,"children":1176},{},[1177],{"type":47,"value":1178},"The clause falls outside the standard position but within a negotiable range. The term is common in the market but not the organization's preference. Requires attention and likely negotiation, but not escalation.",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1180,"children":1181},{},[1182],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1183,"children":1184},{},[1185],{"type":47,"value":1139},{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":1187,"children":1188},{},[1189,1194,1199,1204],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1190,"children":1191},{},[1192],{"type":47,"value":1193},"Liability cap at 6 months of fees when standard is 12 months (below standard but negotiable)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1195,"children":1196},{},[1197],{"type":47,"value":1198},"Unilateral indemnification for IP infringement when standard is mutual (common market position but not preferred)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1200,"children":1201},{},[1202],{"type":47,"value":1203},"Auto-renewal with 60-day notice when standard is 90 days",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1205,"children":1206},{},[1207],{"type":47,"value":1208},"Governing law in an acceptable but not preferred jurisdiction",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1210,"children":1211},{},[1212,1216],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1213,"children":1214},{},[1215],{"type":47,"value":1165},{"type":47,"value":1217},": Generate specific redline language. Provide fallback position. Estimate business impact of accepting vs. negotiating.",{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":1219,"children":1220},{},[1221,1231,1240],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1222,"children":1223},{},[1224,1229],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1225,"children":1226},{},[1227],{"type":47,"value":1228},"Include",{"type":47,"value":1230},": Specific redline language to bring the term back to standard position",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1232,"children":1233},{},[1234,1238],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1235,"children":1236},{},[1237],{"type":47,"value":1228},{"type":47,"value":1239},": Fallback position if the counterparty pushes back",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1241,"children":1242},{},[1243,1247],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1244,"children":1245},{},[1246],{"type":47,"value":1228},{"type":47,"value":1248},": Business impact of accepting as-is vs. negotiating",{"type":41,"tag":618,"props":1250,"children":1252},{"id":1251},"red-escalate",[1253],{"type":47,"value":1254},"RED -- Escalate",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1256,"children":1257},{},[1258],{"type":47,"value":1259},"The clause falls outside acceptable range, triggers a defined escalation criterion, or poses material risk. Requires senior counsel review, outside counsel involvement, or business decision-maker sign-off.",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1261,"children":1262},{},[1263],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1264,"children":1265},{},[1266],{"type":47,"value":1139},{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":1268,"children":1269},{},[1270,1275,1280,1285,1290,1295],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1271,"children":1272},{},[1273],{"type":47,"value":1274},"Uncapped liability or no limitation of liability clause",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1276,"children":1277},{},[1278],{"type":47,"value":1279},"Unilateral broad indemnification with no cap",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1281,"children":1282},{},[1283],{"type":47,"value":1284},"IP assignment of pre-existing IP",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1286,"children":1287},{},[1288],{"type":47,"value":1289},"No DPA offered when personal data is processed",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1291,"children":1292},{},[1293],{"type":47,"value":1294},"Unreasonable non-compete or exclusivity provisions",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1296,"children":1297},{},[1298],{"type":47,"value":1299},"Governing law in a problematic jurisdiction with mandatory arbitration",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1301,"children":1302},{},[1303,1307],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1304,"children":1305},{},[1306],{"type":47,"value":1165},{"type":47,"value":1308},": Explain the specific risk. Provide market-standard alternative language. Estimate exposure. Recommend escalation path.",{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":1310,"children":1311},{},[1312,1321,1330,1339],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1313,"children":1314},{},[1315,1319],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1316,"children":1317},{},[1318],{"type":47,"value":1228},{"type":47,"value":1320},": Why this is a RED flag (specific risk)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1322,"children":1323},{},[1324,1328],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1325,"children":1326},{},[1327],{"type":47,"value":1228},{"type":47,"value":1329},": What the standard market position looks like",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1331,"children":1332},{},[1333,1337],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1334,"children":1335},{},[1336],{"type":47,"value":1228},{"type":47,"value":1338},": Business impact and potential exposure",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1340,"children":1341},{},[1342,1346],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1343,"children":1344},{},[1345],{"type":47,"value":1228},{"type":47,"value":1347},": Recommended escalation path",{"type":41,"tag":116,"props":1349,"children":1351},{"id":1350},"step-6-generate-redline-suggestions",[1352],{"type":47,"value":1353},"Step 6: Generate Redline Suggestions",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1355,"children":1356},{},[1357],{"type":47,"value":1358},"For each YELLOW and RED deviation, provide:",{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":1360,"children":1361},{},[1362,1372,1382,1392],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1363,"children":1364},{},[1365,1370],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1366,"children":1367},{},[1368],{"type":47,"value":1369},"Current language",{"type":47,"value":1371},": Quote the relevant contract text",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1373,"children":1374},{},[1375,1380],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1376,"children":1377},{},[1378],{"type":47,"value":1379},"Suggested redline",{"type":47,"value":1381},": Specific alternative language",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1383,"children":1384},{},[1385,1390],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1386,"children":1387},{},[1388],{"type":47,"value":1389},"Rationale",{"type":47,"value":1391},": Brief explanation suitable for sharing with the counterparty",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1393,"children":1394},{},[1395,1400],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1396,"children":1397},{},[1398],{"type":47,"value":1399},"Priority",{"type":47,"value":1401},": Whether this is a must-have or nice-to-have in negotiation",{"type":41,"tag":618,"props":1403,"children":1405},{"id":1404},"redline-generation-best-practices",[1406],{"type":47,"value":1407},"Redline Generation Best Practices",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1409,"children":1410},{},[1411],{"type":47,"value":1412},"When generating redline suggestions:",{"type":41,"tag":179,"props":1414,"children":1415},{},[1416,1426,1436,1446,1456,1466],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1417,"children":1418},{},[1419,1424],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1420,"children":1421},{},[1422],{"type":47,"value":1423},"Be specific",{"type":47,"value":1425},": Provide exact language, not vague guidance. The redline should be ready to insert.",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1427,"children":1428},{},[1429,1434],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1430,"children":1431},{},[1432],{"type":47,"value":1433},"Be balanced",{"type":47,"value":1435},": Propose language that is firm on critical points but commercially reasonable. Overly aggressive redlines slow negotiations.",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1437,"children":1438},{},[1439,1444],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1440,"children":1441},{},[1442],{"type":47,"value":1443},"Explain the rationale",{"type":47,"value":1445},": Include a brief, professional rationale suitable for sharing with the counterparty's counsel.",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1447,"children":1448},{},[1449,1454],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1450,"children":1451},{},[1452],{"type":47,"value":1453},"Provide fallback positions",{"type":47,"value":1455},": For YELLOW items, include a fallback position if the primary ask is rejected.",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1457,"children":1458},{},[1459,1464],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1460,"children":1461},{},[1462],{"type":47,"value":1463},"Prioritize",{"type":47,"value":1465},": Not all redlines are equal. Indicate which are must-haves and which are nice-to-haves.",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1467,"children":1468},{},[1469,1474],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1470,"children":1471},{},[1472],{"type":47,"value":1473},"Consider the relationship",{"type":47,"value":1475},": Adjust tone and approach based on whether this is a new vendor, strategic partner, or commodity supplier.",{"type":41,"tag":618,"props":1477,"children":1479},{"id":1478},"redline-format",[1480],{"type":47,"value":1481},"Redline Format",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1483,"children":1484},{},[1485],{"type":47,"value":1486},"For each redline:",{"type":41,"tag":92,"props":1488,"children":1491},{"className":1489,"code":1490,"language":47},[95],"**Clause**: [Section reference and clause name]\n**Current language**: \"[exact quote from the contract]\"\n**Proposed redline**: \"[specific alternative language with additions in bold and deletions struck through conceptually]\"\n**Rationale**: [1-2 sentences explaining why, suitable for external sharing]\n**Priority**: [Must-have \u002F Should-have \u002F Nice-to-have]\n**Fallback**: [Alternative position if primary redline is rejected]\n",[1492],{"type":41,"tag":99,"props":1493,"children":1494},{"__ignoreMap":101},[1495],{"type":47,"value":1490},{"type":41,"tag":116,"props":1497,"children":1499},{"id":1498},"step-7-business-impact-summary",[1500],{"type":47,"value":1501},"Step 7: Business Impact Summary",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1503,"children":1504},{},[1505],{"type":47,"value":1506},"Provide a summary section covering:",{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":1508,"children":1509},{},[1510,1520,1530,1540],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1511,"children":1512},{},[1513,1518],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1514,"children":1515},{},[1516],{"type":47,"value":1517},"Overall risk assessment",{"type":47,"value":1519},": High-level view of the contract's risk profile",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1521,"children":1522},{},[1523,1528],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1524,"children":1525},{},[1526],{"type":47,"value":1527},"Top 3 issues",{"type":47,"value":1529},": The most important items to address",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1531,"children":1532},{},[1533,1538],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1534,"children":1535},{},[1536],{"type":47,"value":1537},"Negotiation strategy",{"type":47,"value":1539},": Recommended approach (which issues to lead with, what to concede)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1541,"children":1542},{},[1543,1548],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1544,"children":1545},{},[1546],{"type":47,"value":1547},"Timeline considerations",{"type":47,"value":1549},": Any urgency factors affecting the negotiation approach",{"type":41,"tag":618,"props":1551,"children":1553},{"id":1552},"negotiation-priority-framework",[1554],{"type":47,"value":1555},"Negotiation Priority Framework",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1557,"children":1558},{},[1559],{"type":47,"value":1560},"When presenting redlines, organize by negotiation priority:",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1562,"children":1563},{},[1564,1569],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1565,"children":1566},{},[1567],{"type":47,"value":1568},"Tier 1 -- Must-Haves (Deal Breakers)",{"type":47,"value":1570},"\nIssues where the organization cannot proceed without resolution:",{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":1572,"children":1573},{},[1574,1579,1584,1589],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1575,"children":1576},{},[1577],{"type":47,"value":1578},"Uncapped or materially insufficient liability protections",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1580,"children":1581},{},[1582],{"type":47,"value":1583},"Missing data protection requirements for regulated data",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1585,"children":1586},{},[1587],{"type":47,"value":1588},"IP provisions that could jeopardize core assets",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1590,"children":1591},{},[1592],{"type":47,"value":1593},"Terms that conflict with regulatory obligations",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1595,"children":1596},{},[1597,1602],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1598,"children":1599},{},[1600],{"type":47,"value":1601},"Tier 2 -- Should-Haves (Strong Preferences)",{"type":47,"value":1603},"\nIssues that materially affect risk but have negotiation room:",{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":1605,"children":1606},{},[1607,1612,1617,1622],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1608,"children":1609},{},[1610],{"type":47,"value":1611},"Liability cap adjustments within range",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1613,"children":1614},{},[1615],{"type":47,"value":1616},"Indemnification scope and mutuality",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1618,"children":1619},{},[1620],{"type":47,"value":1621},"Termination flexibility",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1623,"children":1624},{},[1625],{"type":47,"value":1626},"Audit and compliance rights",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1628,"children":1629},{},[1630,1635],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1631,"children":1632},{},[1633],{"type":47,"value":1634},"Tier 3 -- Nice-to-Haves (Concession Candidates)",{"type":47,"value":1636},"\nIssues that improve the position but can be conceded strategically:",{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":1638,"children":1639},{},[1640,1645,1650,1655],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1641,"children":1642},{},[1643],{"type":47,"value":1644},"Preferred governing law (if alternative is acceptable)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1646,"children":1647},{},[1648],{"type":47,"value":1649},"Notice period preferences",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1651,"children":1652},{},[1653],{"type":47,"value":1654},"Minor definitional improvements",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1656,"children":1657},{},[1658],{"type":47,"value":1659},"Insurance certificate requirements",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1661,"children":1662},{},[1663,1667],{"type":41,"tag":77,"props":1664,"children":1665},{},[1666],{"type":47,"value":1537},{"type":47,"value":1668},": Lead with Tier 1 items. Trade Tier 3 concessions to secure Tier 2 wins. Never concede on Tier 1 without escalation.",{"type":41,"tag":116,"props":1670,"children":1672},{"id":1671},"step-8-clm-routing-if-connected",[1673],{"type":47,"value":1674},"Step 8: CLM Routing (If Connected)",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1676,"children":1677},{},[1678],{"type":47,"value":1679},"If a Contract Lifecycle Management system is connected via MCP:",{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":1681,"children":1682},{},[1683,1688,1693],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1684,"children":1685},{},[1686],{"type":47,"value":1687},"Recommend the appropriate approval workflow based on contract type and risk level",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1689,"children":1690},{},[1691],{"type":47,"value":1692},"Suggest the correct routing path (e.g., standard approval, senior counsel, outside counsel)",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1694,"children":1695},{},[1696],{"type":47,"value":1697},"Note any required approvals based on contract value or risk flags",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1699,"children":1700},{},[1701],{"type":47,"value":1702},"If no CLM is connected, skip this step.",{"type":41,"tag":85,"props":1704,"children":1706},{"id":1705},"output-format",[1707],{"type":47,"value":1708},"Output Format",{"type":41,"tag":54,"props":1710,"children":1711},{},[1712],{"type":47,"value":1713},"Structure the output as:",{"type":41,"tag":92,"props":1715,"children":1718},{"className":1716,"code":1717,"language":47},[95],"## Contract Review Summary\n\n**Document**: [contract name\u002Fidentifier]\n**Parties**: [party names and roles]\n**Your Side**: [vendor\u002Fcustomer\u002Fetc.]\n**Deadline**: [if provided]\n**Review Basis**: [Playbook \u002F Generic Standards]\n\n## Key Findings\n\n[Top 3-5 issues with severity flags]\n\n## Clause-by-Clause Analysis\n\n### [Clause Category] -- [GREEN\u002FYELLOW\u002FRED]\n**Contract says**: [summary of the provision]\n**Playbook position**: [your standard]\n**Deviation**: [description of gap]\n**Business impact**: [what this means practically]\n**Redline suggestion**: [specific language, if YELLOW or RED]\n\n[Repeat for each major clause]\n\n## Negotiation Strategy\n\n[Recommended approach, priorities, concession candidates]\n\n## Next Steps\n\n[Specific actions to take]\n",[1719],{"type":41,"tag":99,"props":1720,"children":1721},{"__ignoreMap":101},[1722],{"type":47,"value":1717},{"type":41,"tag":85,"props":1724,"children":1726},{"id":1725},"notes",[1727],{"type":47,"value":1728},"Notes",{"type":41,"tag":128,"props":1730,"children":1731},{},[1732,1737,1742],{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1733,"children":1734},{},[1735],{"type":47,"value":1736},"If the contract is in a language other than English, note this and ask if the user wants a translation or review in the original language",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1738,"children":1739},{},[1740],{"type":47,"value":1741},"For very long contracts (50+ pages), offer to focus on the most material sections first and then do a complete review",{"type":41,"tag":132,"props":1743,"children":1744},{},[1745],{"type":47,"value":1746},"Always remind the user that this analysis should be reviewed by qualified legal counsel before being relied upon for legal decisions",{"items":1748,"total":1865},[1749,1765,1781,1797,1815,1834,1850],{"slug":1750,"name":1750,"fn":1751,"description":1752,"org":1753,"tags":1754,"stars":23,"repoUrl":24,"updatedAt":1764},"accessibility-review","run WCAG accessibility audits","Run a WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility audit on a design or page. Trigger with \"audit accessibility\", \"check a11y\", \"is this accessible?\", or when reviewing a design for color contrast, keyboard navigation, touch target size, or screen reader behavior before handoff.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1755,1758,1761],{"name":1756,"slug":1757,"type":16},"Accessibility","accessibility",{"name":1759,"slug":1760,"type":16},"Design","design",{"name":1762,"slug":1763,"type":16},"WCAG","wcag","2026-04-06T17:58:05.682394",{"slug":1766,"name":1766,"fn":1767,"description":1768,"org":1769,"tags":1770,"stars":23,"repoUrl":24,"updatedAt":1780},"account-research","research accounts for sales intel","Research a company or person and get actionable sales intel. Works standalone with web search, supercharged when you connect enrichment tools or your CRM. Trigger with \"research [company]\", \"look up [person]\", \"intel on [prospect]\", \"who is [name] at [company]\", or \"tell me about [company]\".",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1771,1774,1777],{"name":1772,"slug":1773,"type":16},"CRM","crm",{"name":1775,"slug":1776,"type":16},"Research","research",{"name":1778,"slug":1779,"type":16},"Sales","sales","2026-04-06T17:56:41.410418",{"slug":1782,"name":1782,"fn":1783,"description":1784,"org":1785,"tags":1786,"stars":23,"repoUrl":24,"updatedAt":1796},"analyze","answer data questions and run analyses","Answer data questions -- from quick lookups to full analyses. Use when looking up a single metric, investigating what's driving a trend or drop, comparing segments over time, or preparing a formal data report for stakeholders.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1787,1790,1793],{"name":1788,"slug":1789,"type":16},"Analytics","analytics",{"name":1791,"slug":1792,"type":16},"Data Analysis","data-analysis",{"name":1794,"slug":1795,"type":16},"SQL","sql","2026-04-06T17:57:21.593647",{"slug":1798,"name":1798,"fn":1799,"description":1800,"org":1801,"tags":1802,"stars":23,"repoUrl":24,"updatedAt":1814},"architecture","create and evaluate architecture decision records","Create or evaluate an architecture decision record (ADR). Use when choosing between technologies (e.g., Kafka vs SQS), documenting a design decision with trade-offs and consequences, reviewing a system design proposal, or designing a new component from requirements and constraints.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1803,1806,1808,1811],{"name":1804,"slug":1805,"type":16},"ADR","adr",{"name":1807,"slug":1798,"type":16},"Architecture",{"name":1809,"slug":1810,"type":16},"Documentation","documentation",{"name":1812,"slug":1813,"type":16},"Engineering","engineering","2026-04-06T17:57:49.26444",{"slug":1816,"name":1816,"fn":1817,"description":1818,"org":1819,"tags":1820,"stars":23,"repoUrl":24,"updatedAt":1833},"audit-support","support SOX 404 control testing","Support SOX 404 compliance with control testing methodology, sample selection, and documentation standards. Use when generating testing workpapers, selecting audit samples, classifying control deficiencies, or preparing for internal or external audits.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1821,1824,1827,1830],{"name":1822,"slug":1823,"type":16},"Audit","audit",{"name":1825,"slug":1826,"type":16},"Finance","finance",{"name":1828,"slug":1829,"type":16},"Regulatory Compliance","regulatory-compliance",{"name":1831,"slug":1832,"type":16},"SOX","sox","2026-04-06T17:57:36.714815",{"slug":1835,"name":1835,"fn":1836,"description":1837,"org":1838,"tags":1839,"stars":23,"repoUrl":24,"updatedAt":1849},"brand-review","review content against brand voice","Review content against your brand voice, style guide, and messaging pillars, flagging deviations by severity with specific before\u002Fafter fixes. Use when checking a draft before it ships, when auditing copy for voice consistency and terminology, or when screening for unsubstantiated claims, missing disclaimers, and other legal flags.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1840,1843,1846],{"name":1841,"slug":1842,"type":16},"Branding","branding",{"name":1844,"slug":1845,"type":16},"Marketing","marketing",{"name":1847,"slug":1848,"type":16},"Writing","writing","2026-04-06T17:58:19.548331",{"slug":1851,"name":1851,"fn":1852,"description":1853,"org":1854,"tags":1855,"stars":23,"repoUrl":24,"updatedAt":1864},"brand-voice-enforcement","enforce brand voice in content","This skill applies brand guidelines to content creation. It should be used when the user asks to \"write an email\", \"draft a proposal\", \"create a pitch deck\", \"write a LinkedIn post\", \"draft a presentation\", \"write a Slack message\", \"draft sales content\", or any content creation request where brand voice should be applied. Also triggers on \"on-brand\", \"brand voice\", \"enforce voice\", \"apply brand guidelines\", \"brand-aligned content\", \"write in our voice\", \"use our brand tone\", \"make this sound like us\", \"rewrite this in our tone\", or \"this doesn't sound on-brand\". Not for generating guidelines from scratch (use guideline-generation) or discovering brand materials (use discover-brand).\n",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1856,1857,1860,1863],{"name":1841,"slug":1842,"type":16},{"name":1858,"slug":1859,"type":16},"Communications","communications",{"name":1861,"slug":1862,"type":16},"Content Creation","content-creation",{"name":1847,"slug":1848,"type":16},"2026-04-06T18:00:23.528956",200,{"items":1867,"total":2044},[1868,1887,1899,1911,1930,1941,1962,1982,1992,2007,2015,2028],{"slug":1869,"name":1869,"fn":1870,"description":1871,"org":1872,"tags":1873,"stars":1884,"repoUrl":1885,"updatedAt":1886},"algorithmic-art","create algorithmic art with p5.js","Creating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems. Create original algorithmic art rather than copying existing artists' work to avoid copyright violations.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1874,1877,1878,1881],{"name":1875,"slug":1876,"type":16},"Creative","creative",{"name":1759,"slug":1760,"type":16},{"name":1879,"slug":1880,"type":16},"Generative Art","generative-art",{"name":1882,"slug":1883,"type":16},"JavaScript","javascript",161831,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fanthropics\u002Fskills","2026-04-06T17:56:15.455818",{"slug":1888,"name":1888,"fn":1889,"description":1890,"org":1891,"tags":1892,"stars":1884,"repoUrl":1885,"updatedAt":1898},"brand-guidelines","apply Anthropic brand colors and typography","Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1893,1894,1895],{"name":1841,"slug":1842,"type":16},{"name":1759,"slug":1760,"type":16},{"name":1896,"slug":1897,"type":16},"Typography","typography","2026-04-06T17:56:05.042852",{"slug":1900,"name":1900,"fn":1901,"description":1902,"org":1903,"tags":1904,"stars":1884,"repoUrl":1885,"updatedAt":1910},"canvas-design","create posters and visual art as PNG or PDF","Create beautiful visual art in .png and .pdf documents using design philosophy. You should use this skill when the user asks to create a poster, piece of art, design, or other static piece. Create original visual designs, never copying existing artists' work to avoid copyright violations.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1905,1906,1907],{"name":1875,"slug":1876,"type":16},{"name":1759,"slug":1760,"type":16},{"name":1908,"slug":1909,"type":16},"PDF","pdf","2026-04-06T17:56:03.794732",{"slug":1912,"name":1912,"fn":1913,"description":1914,"org":1915,"tags":1916,"stars":1884,"repoUrl":1885,"updatedAt":1929},"claude-api","build apps with the Claude API","Reference for the Claude API \u002F Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration.\nTRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it \"looks like a one-liner\" — whenever: the prompt names Claude\u002FAnthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing\u002Fmodel choice\u002Flimits\u002Fcaching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent\u002FMCP\u002Ftool-definition\u002Fmulti-agent\u002FRAG\u002FLLM-judge\u002Fcomputer-use; generate\u002Fsummarize\u002Fextract\u002Fclassify\u002Frewrite\u002Fconverse over NL; debugging refusals\u002Fcutoffs\u002Fstreaming\u002Ftool-calls\u002Ftokens).\nSKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI\u002FGPT\u002FGemini\u002FLlama\u002FMistral\u002FCohere\u002FOllama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1917,1920,1921,1924,1926],{"name":1918,"slug":1919,"type":16},"Agents","agents",{"name":9,"slug":8,"type":16},{"name":1922,"slug":1923,"type":16},"Anthropic SDK","anthropic-sdk",{"name":1925,"slug":1912,"type":16},"Claude API",{"name":1927,"slug":1928,"type":16},"LLM","llm","2026-07-28T05:36:08.213335",{"slug":1931,"name":1931,"fn":1932,"description":1933,"org":1934,"tags":1935,"stars":1884,"repoUrl":1885,"updatedAt":1940},"doc-coauthoring","co-author documentation and technical specs","Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1936,1937],{"name":1809,"slug":1810,"type":16},{"name":1938,"slug":1939,"type":16},"Technical Writing","technical-writing","2026-04-06T17:56:14.18897",{"slug":1942,"name":1942,"fn":1943,"description":1944,"org":1945,"tags":1946,"stars":1884,"repoUrl":1885,"updatedAt":1961},"docx","create and edit Word documents","Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files) or Word templates (.dotx files). Triggers include: any mention of 'Word doc', 'word document', '.docx', '.dotx', or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when extracting or reorganizing content from .docx or .dotx files, inserting or replacing images in documents, performing find-and-replace in Word files, working with tracked changes or comments, or converting content into a polished Word document. If the user asks for a 'report', 'memo', 'letter', 'template', or similar deliverable as a Word or .docx file, use this skill. Do NOT use for PDFs, spreadsheets, Google Docs, or general coding tasks unrelated to document generation.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1947,1950,1952,1955,1958],{"name":1948,"slug":1949,"type":16},"Documents","documents",{"name":1951,"slug":1942,"type":16},"DOCX",{"name":1953,"slug":1954,"type":16},"Office","office",{"name":1956,"slug":1957,"type":16},"Templates","templates",{"name":1959,"slug":1960,"type":16},"Word","word","2026-07-18T05:16:23.136271",{"slug":1963,"name":1963,"fn":1964,"description":1965,"org":1966,"tags":1967,"stars":1884,"repoUrl":1885,"updatedAt":1981},"frontend-design","design production-grade frontend interfaces","Guidance for distinctive, intentional visual design when building new UI or reshaping an existing one. Helps with aesthetic direction, typography, and making choices that don't read as templated defaults.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1968,1969,1972,1975,1978],{"name":1759,"slug":1760,"type":16},{"name":1970,"slug":1971,"type":16},"Frontend","frontend",{"name":1973,"slug":1974,"type":16},"React","react",{"name":1976,"slug":1977,"type":16},"Tailwind CSS","tailwind-css",{"name":1979,"slug":1980,"type":16},"UI Components","ui-components","2026-04-06T17:56:16.723469",{"slug":1983,"name":1983,"fn":1984,"description":1985,"org":1986,"tags":1987,"stars":1884,"repoUrl":1885,"updatedAt":1991},"internal-comms","write internal company communications","A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1988,1989,1990],{"name":1858,"slug":1859,"type":16},{"name":1956,"slug":1957,"type":16},{"name":1847,"slug":1848,"type":16},"2026-04-06T17:56:20.695522",{"slug":1993,"name":1993,"fn":1994,"description":1995,"org":1996,"tags":1997,"stars":1884,"repoUrl":1885,"updatedAt":2006},"mcp-builder","build MCP servers","Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node\u002FTypeScript (MCP SDK).",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1998,1999,2002,2003],{"name":1918,"slug":1919,"type":16},{"name":2000,"slug":2001,"type":16},"API Development","api-development",{"name":1927,"slug":1928,"type":16},{"name":2004,"slug":2005,"type":16},"MCP","mcp","2026-04-06T17:56:10.357665",{"slug":1909,"name":1909,"fn":2008,"description":2009,"org":2010,"tags":2011,"stars":1884,"repoUrl":1885,"updatedAt":2014},"read edit and manipulate PDF files","Use this skill whenever the user wants to do anything with PDF files. This includes reading or extracting text\u002Ftables from PDFs, combining or merging multiple PDFs into one, splitting PDFs apart, rotating pages, adding watermarks, creating new PDFs, filling PDF forms, encrypting\u002Fdecrypting PDFs, extracting images, and OCR on scanned PDFs to make them searchable. If the user mentions a .pdf file or asks to produce one, use this skill.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[2012,2013],{"name":1948,"slug":1949,"type":16},{"name":1908,"slug":1909,"type":16},"2026-04-06T17:56:02.483316",{"slug":2016,"name":2016,"fn":2017,"description":2018,"org":2019,"tags":2020,"stars":1884,"repoUrl":1885,"updatedAt":2027},"pptx","create and edit PowerPoint presentations","Use this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an email or summary); editing, modifying, or updating existing presentations; combining or splitting slide files; working with templates (.potx), layouts, speaker notes, or comments. Trigger whenever the user mentions \"deck,\" \"slides,\" \"presentation,\" or references a .pptx or .potx filename, regardless of what they plan to do with the content afterward. If a .pptx or .potx file needs to be opened, created, or touched, use this skill.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[2021,2024],{"name":2022,"slug":2023,"type":16},"PowerPoint","powerpoint",{"name":2025,"slug":2026,"type":16},"Presentations","presentations","2026-07-18T05:16:24.1471",{"slug":2029,"name":2029,"fn":2030,"description":2031,"org":2032,"tags":2033,"stars":1884,"repoUrl":1885,"updatedAt":2043},"skill-creator","create and optimize agent skills","Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[2034,2035,2036,2039,2042],{"name":1918,"slug":1919,"type":16},{"name":1809,"slug":1810,"type":16},{"name":2037,"slug":2038,"type":16},"Evals","evals",{"name":2040,"slug":2041,"type":16},"Performance","performance",{"name":1938,"slug":1939,"type":16},"2026-04-19T06:45:40.804",490]