[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill-anthropic-contract-review":3,"mdc--cvvscs-key":40,"related-repo-anthropic-contract-review":643,"related-org-anthropic-contract-review":762},{"slug":4,"name":4,"fn":5,"description":6,"org":7,"tags":12,"stars":29,"repoUrl":30,"updatedAt":31,"license":32,"forks":33,"topics":34,"repo":35,"sourceUrl":38,"mdContent":39},"contract-review","review vendor and employment contracts","Lightweight NDA, MSA, and vendor contract review for SMBs without legal on staff. Reads contracts from local files, Gmail attachments, or DocuSign envelopes; flags non-standard terms; explains risks in plain English; and outputs a marked-up redline as a separate DOCX. Use when the user says \"review this contract,\" \"what am I signing,\" \"red flags,\" \"flag any concerns,\" \"check the payment terms,\" or uploads\u002Fforwards a contract or legal agreement.\n",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},"anthropic","Anthropic","https:\u002F\u002Fpexgzepcugksgbtrxkhf.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Forg-logos\u002Fanthropic.png","anthropics",[13,17,20,23,26],{"name":14,"slug":15,"type":16},"Contracts","contracts","tag",{"name":18,"slug":19,"type":16},"NDA","nda",{"name":21,"slug":22,"type":16},"Documents","documents",{"name":24,"slug":25,"type":16},"E-Signature","e-signature",{"name":27,"slug":28,"type":16},"Legal","legal",22885,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fanthropics\u002Fknowledge-work-plugins","2026-05-14T06:03:05.107635",null,2736,[],{"repoUrl":30,"stars":29,"forks":33,"topics":36,"description":37},[],"Open source repository of plugins primarily intended for knowledge workers to use in Claude Cowork","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fanthropics\u002Fknowledge-work-plugins\u002Ftree\u002FHEAD\u002Fsmall-business\u002Fskills\u002Fcontract-review","---\nname: contract-review\ndescription: >\n  Lightweight NDA, MSA, and vendor contract review for SMBs without legal on\n  staff. Reads contracts from local files, Gmail attachments, or DocuSign\n  envelopes; flags non-standard terms; explains risks in plain English; and\n  outputs a marked-up redline as a separate DOCX. Use when the user says\n  \"review this contract,\" \"what am I signing,\" \"red flags,\" \"flag any concerns,\"\n  \"check the payment terms,\" or uploads\u002Fforwards a contract or legal agreement.\n---\n\n# Contract Review\n\n## Quick start\n\nAttach a contract file, forward the email containing it, or paste the text directly.\n\n```\nUser: \"Review this MSA and flag anything I should push back on.\"\n→ Skill reads the document, identifies parties and contract type,\n  analyzes 8 risk categories, returns a severity-tiered summary\n  with a negotiation playbook, and exports a redlined DOCX.\n```\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. **Get the contract** — Pull from one of three sources, in order of preference:\n   - **Gmail**: Search for recent emails with contract attachments (see `reference\u002Fgmail-fetch.md`)\n   - **DocuSign**: Fetch the envelope by ID or search recent drafts awaiting signature (see `reference\u002Fdocusign-fetch.md`)\n   - **Local file or paste**: Read the PDF (chunked via `pages` parameter for 10+ page files) or DOCX via Read tool. If the user pastes text directly, work with what's provided.\n\n   Read the full document before analyzing. Dangerous clauses are frequently in exhibits and schedules at the back.\n\n2. **Identify contract type and parties** — Determine agreement type (NDA, MSA, SOW, SaaS subscription, consulting, subcontractor, vendor) and which party is the user's company vs. the counterparty. Note if it looks like a counterparty template — these are typically one-sided and the counterparty expects pushback.\n\n3. **Analyze across 8 risk categories** — Work through the contract from the ops\u002Ffinance perspective of a small business owner without in-house legal. Categories are ordered by typical risk severity; use judgment for context.\n\n   **Category 1: Payment terms and cash flow**\n   - Payment timing: Net-30 is standard; Net-60+ is flaggable; Net-90\u002F120 is a hard negotiation point\n   - Payment triggers: acceptance periods that let the client slow-walk approvals indefinitely\n   - Late payment penalties: absence is a gap worth noting\n   - Invoicing requirements: rigid formats or PO numbers that can delay payment on technicalities\n   - Expense reimbursement: pre-approval requirements and caps\n   - Rate adjustments: annual increase mechanism for multi-year engagements\n\n   **Category 2: Liability and indemnification**\n   - Liability caps: uncapped liability is always a red flag\n   - Mutual vs. one-sided indemnification\n   - Indemnification scope: \"any and all claims arising from the services\" is not standard\n   - Insurance requirements: E&O, cyber, general liability — achievability at the required limits\n   - Consequential damages waiver: missing = flag prominently\n\n   **Category 3: Termination and exit**\n   - Termination for convenience: is it mutual? 30-day notice is typical\n   - Termination for cause: cure period; vague \"material breach\" without definition\n   - Wind-down: payment for in-progress work at termination\n   - Transition assistance: paid vs. unpaid, time-limited vs. open-ended\n   - Survival clauses: indefinite indemnification survival = flag\n\n   **Category 4: Intellectual property**\n   - IP assignment vs. license\n   - Pre-existing IP and background tools carve-out — absence means inadvertent assignment\n   - Work product definition breadth: drafts, notes, internal tools\n\n   **Category 5: Scope and change management**\n   - Scope definition clarity\n   - Change order process: absence = scope creep without compensation\n   - Acceptance criteria: subjective (\"to client's satisfaction\") vs. defined\n   - Timeline asymmetry: user penalized for delays but client is not for slow feedback\n\n   **Category 6: Non-compete and exclusivity**\n   - Non-compete scope, definition of \"competitor,\" duration\n   - Exclusivity requirements on the user's company\n   - Non-solicitation: employee poaching is normal; industry-broad restrictions are not\n\n   **Category 7: Confidentiality and data**\n   - Confidentiality scope: \"all information shared\" with no exceptions is overly broad\n   - Duration: 2–3 years is typical; perpetual is aggressive\n   - Data handling security requirements vs. company size and data sensitivity\n   - Return\u002Fdestruction requirements post-termination\n\n   **Category 8: Operational concerns**\n   - Governing law and dispute resolution; mandatory arbitration\n   - Auto-renewal: opt-out window and notice period (missing a 60-day window is a common SMB mistake)\n   - Assignment rights, especially if the client gets acquired\n   - Most favored nation: constrains pricing across the entire client book\n   - Audit rights: scope and frequency\n\n4. **Present flagged summary** — Organize by severity:\n\n   **🔴 Red flags (push back before signing)** — For each: quote the exact clause, explain the problem in plain language, suggest specific alternative language.\n\n   **🟡 Yellow flags (negotiate, not deal-breakers)** — For each: quote the clause, explain the concern, describe what \"better\" looks like.\n\n   **🟢 Key terms to note (awareness only)** — Payment schedules, notice periods, renewal dates, insurance requirements, key contacts.\n\n   **📋 Contract summary** — Plain-language summary: who does what, for how much, over what timeframe, under what conditions.\n\n   **💡 Negotiation playbook** — For each red and yellow flag: what to ask for, how to frame the ask, and what a reasonable compromise looks like.\n\n5. **Export redline DOCX** — After presenting the summary, offer to export a redlined DOCX with the suggested changes marked up. Use the `docx` skill to generate a Word document that:\n   - Preserves the original contract structure\n   - Marks suggested deletions in strikethrough and additions in underline\n   - Adds a cover page summarizing the changes\n\n   Ask: \"Want me to export a redlined DOCX you can send back to the counterparty?\"\n\n## Approval gates\n\n- Never characterize the output as legal advice. Always recommend attorney review for red flags or binding decisions.\n- Quote actual clause language, not paraphrases. The user needs the exact text for negotiation calls.\n- Flag what's missing, not just what's there. A contract silent on liability caps or change orders is often more dangerous than one with unfavorable terms.\n- Do not flag standard boilerplate. If a clause is fair and market-standard, skip it. The user wants signal, not a clause-by-clause restatement.\n- Compare to market norms when flagging: \"Net-90 is uncommon in professional services — Net-30 is standard.\"\n- Adjust recommendations to the power dynamic. A Fortune 500 procurement MSA is a different negotiation than a small startup agreement.\n- Never send the redlined DOCX to the counterparty without explicit user confirmation.\n\n## Reference\n\n- `reference\u002Fgotchas.md` — edge cases in contract analysis\n- `reference\u002Fdocusign-fetch.md` — pulling envelopes from DocuSign\n- `reference\u002Fgmail-fetch.md` — finding contract attachments in Gmail\n- `reference\u002Fexamples\u002Fflagged-summary-saas.md` — worked example: SaaS agreement review output\n",{"data":41,"body":42},{"name":4,"description":6},{"type":43,"children":44},"root",[45,53,60,66,79,85,548,554,592,598],{"type":46,"tag":47,"props":48,"children":49},"element","h1",{"id":4},[50],{"type":51,"value":52},"text","Contract Review",{"type":46,"tag":54,"props":55,"children":57},"h2",{"id":56},"quick-start",[58],{"type":51,"value":59},"Quick start",{"type":46,"tag":61,"props":62,"children":63},"p",{},[64],{"type":51,"value":65},"Attach a contract file, forward the email containing it, or paste the text directly.",{"type":46,"tag":67,"props":68,"children":72},"pre",{"className":69,"code":71,"language":51},[70],"language-text","User: \"Review this MSA and flag anything I should push back on.\"\n→ Skill reads the document, identifies parties and contract type,\n  analyzes 8 risk categories, returns a severity-tiered summary\n  with a negotiation playbook, and exports a redlined DOCX.\n",[73],{"type":46,"tag":74,"props":75,"children":77},"code",{"__ignoreMap":76},"",[78],{"type":51,"value":71},{"type":46,"tag":54,"props":80,"children":82},{"id":81},"workflow",[83],{"type":51,"value":84},"Workflow",{"type":46,"tag":86,"props":87,"children":88},"ol",{},[89,164,174,447,507],{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":91,"children":92},"li",{},[93,99,101,158,162],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":95,"children":96},"strong",{},[97],{"type":51,"value":98},"Get the contract",{"type":51,"value":100}," — Pull from one of three sources, in order of preference:",{"type":46,"tag":102,"props":103,"children":104},"ul",{},[105,123,140],{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":106,"children":107},{},[108,113,115,121],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":109,"children":110},{},[111],{"type":51,"value":112},"Gmail",{"type":51,"value":114},": Search for recent emails with contract attachments (see ",{"type":46,"tag":74,"props":116,"children":118},{"className":117},[],[119],{"type":51,"value":120},"reference\u002Fgmail-fetch.md",{"type":51,"value":122},")",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":124,"children":125},{},[126,131,133,139],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":127,"children":128},{},[129],{"type":51,"value":130},"DocuSign",{"type":51,"value":132},": Fetch the envelope by ID or search recent drafts awaiting signature (see ",{"type":46,"tag":74,"props":134,"children":136},{"className":135},[],[137],{"type":51,"value":138},"reference\u002Fdocusign-fetch.md",{"type":51,"value":122},{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":141,"children":142},{},[143,148,150,156],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":144,"children":145},{},[146],{"type":51,"value":147},"Local file or paste",{"type":51,"value":149},": Read the PDF (chunked via ",{"type":46,"tag":74,"props":151,"children":153},{"className":152},[],[154],{"type":51,"value":155},"pages",{"type":51,"value":157}," parameter for 10+ page files) or DOCX via Read tool. If the user pastes text directly, work with what's provided.",{"type":46,"tag":159,"props":160,"children":161},"br",{},[],{"type":51,"value":163},"Read the full document before analyzing. Dangerous clauses are frequently in exhibits and schedules at the back.",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":165,"children":166},{},[167,172],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":168,"children":169},{},[170],{"type":51,"value":171},"Identify contract type and parties",{"type":51,"value":173}," — Determine agreement type (NDA, MSA, SOW, SaaS subscription, consulting, subcontractor, vendor) and which party is the user's company vs. the counterparty. Note if it looks like a counterparty template — these are typically one-sided and the counterparty expects pushback.",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":175,"children":176},{},[177,182,184,187,192,225,228,233,261,264,269,297,300,305,323,326,331,354,357,362,380,383,388,411,414,419],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":178,"children":179},{},[180],{"type":51,"value":181},"Analyze across 8 risk categories",{"type":51,"value":183}," — Work through the contract from the ops\u002Ffinance perspective of a small business owner without in-house legal. Categories are ordered by typical risk severity; use judgment for context.",{"type":46,"tag":159,"props":185,"children":186},{},[],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":188,"children":189},{},[190],{"type":51,"value":191},"Category 1: Payment terms and cash flow",{"type":46,"tag":102,"props":193,"children":194},{},[195,200,205,210,215,220],{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":196,"children":197},{},[198],{"type":51,"value":199},"Payment timing: Net-30 is standard; Net-60+ is flaggable; Net-90\u002F120 is a hard negotiation point",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":201,"children":202},{},[203],{"type":51,"value":204},"Payment triggers: acceptance periods that let the client slow-walk approvals indefinitely",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":206,"children":207},{},[208],{"type":51,"value":209},"Late payment penalties: absence is a gap worth noting",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":211,"children":212},{},[213],{"type":51,"value":214},"Invoicing requirements: rigid formats or PO numbers that can delay payment on technicalities",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":216,"children":217},{},[218],{"type":51,"value":219},"Expense reimbursement: pre-approval requirements and caps",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":221,"children":222},{},[223],{"type":51,"value":224},"Rate adjustments: annual increase mechanism for multi-year engagements",{"type":46,"tag":159,"props":226,"children":227},{},[],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":229,"children":230},{},[231],{"type":51,"value":232},"Category 2: Liability and indemnification",{"type":46,"tag":102,"props":234,"children":235},{},[236,241,246,251,256],{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":237,"children":238},{},[239],{"type":51,"value":240},"Liability caps: uncapped liability is always a red flag",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":242,"children":243},{},[244],{"type":51,"value":245},"Mutual vs. one-sided indemnification",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":247,"children":248},{},[249],{"type":51,"value":250},"Indemnification scope: \"any and all claims arising from the services\" is not standard",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":252,"children":253},{},[254],{"type":51,"value":255},"Insurance requirements: E&O, cyber, general liability — achievability at the required limits",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":257,"children":258},{},[259],{"type":51,"value":260},"Consequential damages waiver: missing = flag prominently",{"type":46,"tag":159,"props":262,"children":263},{},[],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":265,"children":266},{},[267],{"type":51,"value":268},"Category 3: Termination and exit",{"type":46,"tag":102,"props":270,"children":271},{},[272,277,282,287,292],{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":273,"children":274},{},[275],{"type":51,"value":276},"Termination for convenience: is it mutual? 30-day notice is typical",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":278,"children":279},{},[280],{"type":51,"value":281},"Termination for cause: cure period; vague \"material breach\" without definition",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":283,"children":284},{},[285],{"type":51,"value":286},"Wind-down: payment for in-progress work at termination",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":288,"children":289},{},[290],{"type":51,"value":291},"Transition assistance: paid vs. unpaid, time-limited vs. open-ended",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":293,"children":294},{},[295],{"type":51,"value":296},"Survival clauses: indefinite indemnification survival = flag",{"type":46,"tag":159,"props":298,"children":299},{},[],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":301,"children":302},{},[303],{"type":51,"value":304},"Category 4: Intellectual property",{"type":46,"tag":102,"props":306,"children":307},{},[308,313,318],{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":309,"children":310},{},[311],{"type":51,"value":312},"IP assignment vs. license",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":314,"children":315},{},[316],{"type":51,"value":317},"Pre-existing IP and background tools carve-out — absence means inadvertent assignment",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":319,"children":320},{},[321],{"type":51,"value":322},"Work product definition breadth: drafts, notes, internal tools",{"type":46,"tag":159,"props":324,"children":325},{},[],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":327,"children":328},{},[329],{"type":51,"value":330},"Category 5: Scope and change management",{"type":46,"tag":102,"props":332,"children":333},{},[334,339,344,349],{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":335,"children":336},{},[337],{"type":51,"value":338},"Scope definition clarity",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":340,"children":341},{},[342],{"type":51,"value":343},"Change order process: absence = scope creep without compensation",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":345,"children":346},{},[347],{"type":51,"value":348},"Acceptance criteria: subjective (\"to client's satisfaction\") vs. defined",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":350,"children":351},{},[352],{"type":51,"value":353},"Timeline asymmetry: user penalized for delays but client is not for slow feedback",{"type":46,"tag":159,"props":355,"children":356},{},[],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":358,"children":359},{},[360],{"type":51,"value":361},"Category 6: Non-compete and exclusivity",{"type":46,"tag":102,"props":363,"children":364},{},[365,370,375],{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":366,"children":367},{},[368],{"type":51,"value":369},"Non-compete scope, definition of \"competitor,\" duration",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":371,"children":372},{},[373],{"type":51,"value":374},"Exclusivity requirements on the user's company",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":376,"children":377},{},[378],{"type":51,"value":379},"Non-solicitation: employee poaching is normal; industry-broad restrictions are not",{"type":46,"tag":159,"props":381,"children":382},{},[],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":384,"children":385},{},[386],{"type":51,"value":387},"Category 7: Confidentiality and data",{"type":46,"tag":102,"props":389,"children":390},{},[391,396,401,406],{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":392,"children":393},{},[394],{"type":51,"value":395},"Confidentiality scope: \"all information shared\" with no exceptions is overly broad",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":397,"children":398},{},[399],{"type":51,"value":400},"Duration: 2–3 years is typical; perpetual is aggressive",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":402,"children":403},{},[404],{"type":51,"value":405},"Data handling security requirements vs. company size and data sensitivity",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":407,"children":408},{},[409],{"type":51,"value":410},"Return\u002Fdestruction requirements post-termination",{"type":46,"tag":159,"props":412,"children":413},{},[],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":415,"children":416},{},[417],{"type":51,"value":418},"Category 8: Operational concerns",{"type":46,"tag":102,"props":420,"children":421},{},[422,427,432,437,442],{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":423,"children":424},{},[425],{"type":51,"value":426},"Governing law and dispute resolution; mandatory arbitration",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":428,"children":429},{},[430],{"type":51,"value":431},"Auto-renewal: opt-out window and notice period (missing a 60-day window is a common SMB mistake)",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":433,"children":434},{},[435],{"type":51,"value":436},"Assignment rights, especially if the client gets acquired",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":438,"children":439},{},[440],{"type":51,"value":441},"Most favored nation: constrains pricing across the entire client book",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":443,"children":444},{},[445],{"type":51,"value":446},"Audit rights: scope and frequency",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":448,"children":449},{},[450,455,457,460,465,467,470,475,477,480,485,487,490,495,497,500,505],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":451,"children":452},{},[453],{"type":51,"value":454},"Present flagged summary",{"type":51,"value":456}," — Organize by severity:",{"type":46,"tag":159,"props":458,"children":459},{},[],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":461,"children":462},{},[463],{"type":51,"value":464},"🔴 Red flags (push back before signing)",{"type":51,"value":466}," — For each: quote the exact clause, explain the problem in plain language, suggest specific alternative language.",{"type":46,"tag":159,"props":468,"children":469},{},[],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":471,"children":472},{},[473],{"type":51,"value":474},"🟡 Yellow flags (negotiate, not deal-breakers)",{"type":51,"value":476}," — For each: quote the clause, explain the concern, describe what \"better\" looks like.",{"type":46,"tag":159,"props":478,"children":479},{},[],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":481,"children":482},{},[483],{"type":51,"value":484},"🟢 Key terms to note (awareness only)",{"type":51,"value":486}," — Payment schedules, notice periods, renewal dates, insurance requirements, key contacts.",{"type":46,"tag":159,"props":488,"children":489},{},[],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":491,"children":492},{},[493],{"type":51,"value":494},"📋 Contract summary",{"type":51,"value":496}," — Plain-language summary: who does what, for how much, over what timeframe, under what conditions.",{"type":46,"tag":159,"props":498,"children":499},{},[],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":501,"children":502},{},[503],{"type":51,"value":504},"💡 Negotiation playbook",{"type":51,"value":506}," — For each red and yellow flag: what to ask for, how to frame the ask, and what a reasonable compromise looks like.",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":508,"children":509},{},[510,515,517,523,525,543,546],{"type":46,"tag":94,"props":511,"children":512},{},[513],{"type":51,"value":514},"Export redline DOCX",{"type":51,"value":516}," — After presenting the summary, offer to export a redlined DOCX with the suggested changes marked up. Use the ",{"type":46,"tag":74,"props":518,"children":520},{"className":519},[],[521],{"type":51,"value":522},"docx",{"type":51,"value":524}," skill to generate a Word document that:",{"type":46,"tag":102,"props":526,"children":527},{},[528,533,538],{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":529,"children":530},{},[531],{"type":51,"value":532},"Preserves the original contract structure",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":534,"children":535},{},[536],{"type":51,"value":537},"Marks suggested deletions in strikethrough and additions in underline",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":539,"children":540},{},[541],{"type":51,"value":542},"Adds a cover page summarizing the changes",{"type":46,"tag":159,"props":544,"children":545},{},[],{"type":51,"value":547},"Ask: \"Want me to export a redlined DOCX you can send back to the counterparty?\"",{"type":46,"tag":54,"props":549,"children":551},{"id":550},"approval-gates",[552],{"type":51,"value":553},"Approval gates",{"type":46,"tag":102,"props":555,"children":556},{},[557,562,567,572,577,582,587],{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":558,"children":559},{},[560],{"type":51,"value":561},"Never characterize the output as legal advice. Always recommend attorney review for red flags or binding decisions.",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":563,"children":564},{},[565],{"type":51,"value":566},"Quote actual clause language, not paraphrases. The user needs the exact text for negotiation calls.",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":568,"children":569},{},[570],{"type":51,"value":571},"Flag what's missing, not just what's there. A contract silent on liability caps or change orders is often more dangerous than one with unfavorable terms.",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":573,"children":574},{},[575],{"type":51,"value":576},"Do not flag standard boilerplate. If a clause is fair and market-standard, skip it. The user wants signal, not a clause-by-clause restatement.",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":578,"children":579},{},[580],{"type":51,"value":581},"Compare to market norms when flagging: \"Net-90 is uncommon in professional services — Net-30 is standard.\"",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":583,"children":584},{},[585],{"type":51,"value":586},"Adjust recommendations to the power dynamic. A Fortune 500 procurement MSA is a different negotiation than a small startup agreement.",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":588,"children":589},{},[590],{"type":51,"value":591},"Never send the redlined DOCX to the counterparty without explicit user confirmation.",{"type":46,"tag":54,"props":593,"children":595},{"id":594},"reference",[596],{"type":51,"value":597},"Reference",{"type":46,"tag":102,"props":599,"children":600},{},[601,612,622,632],{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":602,"children":603},{},[604,610],{"type":46,"tag":74,"props":605,"children":607},{"className":606},[],[608],{"type":51,"value":609},"reference\u002Fgotchas.md",{"type":51,"value":611}," — edge cases in contract analysis",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":613,"children":614},{},[615,620],{"type":46,"tag":74,"props":616,"children":618},{"className":617},[],[619],{"type":51,"value":138},{"type":51,"value":621}," — pulling envelopes from DocuSign",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":623,"children":624},{},[625,630],{"type":46,"tag":74,"props":626,"children":628},{"className":627},[],[629],{"type":51,"value":120},{"type":51,"value":631}," — finding contract attachments in Gmail",{"type":46,"tag":90,"props":633,"children":634},{},[635,641],{"type":46,"tag":74,"props":636,"children":638},{"className":637},[],[639],{"type":51,"value":640},"reference\u002Fexamples\u002Fflagged-summary-saas.md",{"type":51,"value":642}," — worked example: SaaS agreement review output",{"items":644,"total":761},[645,661,677,693,711,730,746],{"slug":646,"name":646,"fn":647,"description":648,"org":649,"tags":650,"stars":29,"repoUrl":30,"updatedAt":660},"accessibility-review","run WCAG accessibility audits","Run a WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility audit on a design or page. Trigger with \"audit accessibility\", \"check a11y\", \"is this accessible?\", or when reviewing a design for color contrast, keyboard navigation, touch target size, or screen reader behavior before handoff.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[651,654,657],{"name":652,"slug":653,"type":16},"Accessibility","accessibility",{"name":655,"slug":656,"type":16},"Design","design",{"name":658,"slug":659,"type":16},"WCAG","wcag","2026-04-06T17:58:05.682394",{"slug":662,"name":662,"fn":663,"description":664,"org":665,"tags":666,"stars":29,"repoUrl":30,"updatedAt":676},"account-research","research accounts for sales intel","Research a company or person and get actionable sales intel. Works standalone with web search, supercharged when you connect enrichment tools or your CRM. Trigger with \"research [company]\", \"look up [person]\", \"intel on [prospect]\", \"who is [name] at [company]\", or \"tell me about [company]\".",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[667,670,673],{"name":668,"slug":669,"type":16},"CRM","crm",{"name":671,"slug":672,"type":16},"Research","research",{"name":674,"slug":675,"type":16},"Sales","sales","2026-04-06T17:56:41.410418",{"slug":678,"name":678,"fn":679,"description":680,"org":681,"tags":682,"stars":29,"repoUrl":30,"updatedAt":692},"analyze","answer data questions and run analyses","Answer data questions -- from quick lookups to full analyses. Use when looking up a single metric, investigating what's driving a trend or drop, comparing segments over time, or preparing a formal data report for stakeholders.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[683,686,689],{"name":684,"slug":685,"type":16},"Analytics","analytics",{"name":687,"slug":688,"type":16},"Data Analysis","data-analysis",{"name":690,"slug":691,"type":16},"SQL","sql","2026-04-06T17:57:21.593647",{"slug":694,"name":694,"fn":695,"description":696,"org":697,"tags":698,"stars":29,"repoUrl":30,"updatedAt":710},"architecture","create and evaluate architecture decision records","Create or evaluate an architecture decision record (ADR). Use when choosing between technologies (e.g., Kafka vs SQS), documenting a design decision with trade-offs and consequences, reviewing a system design proposal, or designing a new component from requirements and constraints.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[699,702,704,707],{"name":700,"slug":701,"type":16},"ADR","adr",{"name":703,"slug":694,"type":16},"Architecture",{"name":705,"slug":706,"type":16},"Documentation","documentation",{"name":708,"slug":709,"type":16},"Engineering","engineering","2026-04-06T17:57:49.26444",{"slug":712,"name":712,"fn":713,"description":714,"org":715,"tags":716,"stars":29,"repoUrl":30,"updatedAt":729},"audit-support","support SOX 404 control testing","Support SOX 404 compliance with control testing methodology, sample selection, and documentation standards. Use when generating testing workpapers, selecting audit samples, classifying control deficiencies, or preparing for internal or external audits.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[717,720,723,726],{"name":718,"slug":719,"type":16},"Audit","audit",{"name":721,"slug":722,"type":16},"Finance","finance",{"name":724,"slug":725,"type":16},"Regulatory Compliance","regulatory-compliance",{"name":727,"slug":728,"type":16},"SOX","sox","2026-04-06T17:57:36.714815",{"slug":731,"name":731,"fn":732,"description":733,"org":734,"tags":735,"stars":29,"repoUrl":30,"updatedAt":745},"brand-review","review content against brand voice","Review content against your brand voice, style guide, and messaging pillars, flagging deviations by severity with specific before\u002Fafter fixes. Use when checking a draft before it ships, when auditing copy for voice consistency and terminology, or when screening for unsubstantiated claims, missing disclaimers, and other legal flags.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[736,739,742],{"name":737,"slug":738,"type":16},"Branding","branding",{"name":740,"slug":741,"type":16},"Marketing","marketing",{"name":743,"slug":744,"type":16},"Writing","writing","2026-04-06T17:58:19.548331",{"slug":747,"name":747,"fn":748,"description":749,"org":750,"tags":751,"stars":29,"repoUrl":30,"updatedAt":760},"brand-voice-enforcement","enforce brand voice in content","This skill applies brand guidelines to content creation. It should be used when the user asks to \"write an email\", \"draft a proposal\", \"create a pitch deck\", \"write a LinkedIn post\", \"draft a presentation\", \"write a Slack message\", \"draft sales content\", or any content creation request where brand voice should be applied. Also triggers on \"on-brand\", \"brand voice\", \"enforce voice\", \"apply brand guidelines\", \"brand-aligned content\", \"write in our voice\", \"use our brand tone\", \"make this sound like us\", \"rewrite this in our tone\", or \"this doesn't sound on-brand\". Not for generating guidelines from scratch (use guideline-generation) or discovering brand materials (use discover-brand).\n",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[752,753,756,759],{"name":737,"slug":738,"type":16},{"name":754,"slug":755,"type":16},"Communications","communications",{"name":757,"slug":758,"type":16},"Content Creation","content-creation",{"name":743,"slug":744,"type":16},"2026-04-06T18:00:23.528956",200,{"items":763,"total":937},[764,783,795,807,826,837,855,875,885,900,908,921],{"slug":765,"name":765,"fn":766,"description":767,"org":768,"tags":769,"stars":780,"repoUrl":781,"updatedAt":782},"algorithmic-art","create algorithmic art with p5.js","Creating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems. Create original algorithmic art rather than copying existing artists' work to avoid copyright violations.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[770,773,774,777],{"name":771,"slug":772,"type":16},"Creative","creative",{"name":655,"slug":656,"type":16},{"name":775,"slug":776,"type":16},"Generative Art","generative-art",{"name":778,"slug":779,"type":16},"JavaScript","javascript",161831,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fanthropics\u002Fskills","2026-04-06T17:56:15.455818",{"slug":784,"name":784,"fn":785,"description":786,"org":787,"tags":788,"stars":780,"repoUrl":781,"updatedAt":794},"brand-guidelines","apply Anthropic brand colors and typography","Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[789,790,791],{"name":737,"slug":738,"type":16},{"name":655,"slug":656,"type":16},{"name":792,"slug":793,"type":16},"Typography","typography","2026-04-06T17:56:05.042852",{"slug":796,"name":796,"fn":797,"description":798,"org":799,"tags":800,"stars":780,"repoUrl":781,"updatedAt":806},"canvas-design","create posters and visual art as PNG or PDF","Create beautiful visual art in .png and .pdf documents using design philosophy. You should use this skill when the user asks to create a poster, piece of art, design, or other static piece. Create original visual designs, never copying existing artists' work to avoid copyright violations.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[801,802,803],{"name":771,"slug":772,"type":16},{"name":655,"slug":656,"type":16},{"name":804,"slug":805,"type":16},"PDF","pdf","2026-04-06T17:56:03.794732",{"slug":808,"name":808,"fn":809,"description":810,"org":811,"tags":812,"stars":780,"repoUrl":781,"updatedAt":825},"claude-api","build apps with the Claude API","Reference for the Claude API \u002F Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration.\nTRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it \"looks like a one-liner\" — whenever: the prompt names Claude\u002FAnthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing\u002Fmodel choice\u002Flimits\u002Fcaching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent\u002FMCP\u002Ftool-definition\u002Fmulti-agent\u002FRAG\u002FLLM-judge\u002Fcomputer-use; generate\u002Fsummarize\u002Fextract\u002Fclassify\u002Frewrite\u002Fconverse over NL; debugging refusals\u002Fcutoffs\u002Fstreaming\u002Ftool-calls\u002Ftokens).\nSKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI\u002FGPT\u002FGemini\u002FLlama\u002FMistral\u002FCohere\u002FOllama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[813,816,817,820,822],{"name":814,"slug":815,"type":16},"Agents","agents",{"name":9,"slug":8,"type":16},{"name":818,"slug":819,"type":16},"Anthropic SDK","anthropic-sdk",{"name":821,"slug":808,"type":16},"Claude API",{"name":823,"slug":824,"type":16},"LLM","llm","2026-07-28T05:36:08.213335",{"slug":827,"name":827,"fn":828,"description":829,"org":830,"tags":831,"stars":780,"repoUrl":781,"updatedAt":836},"doc-coauthoring","co-author documentation and technical specs","Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[832,833],{"name":705,"slug":706,"type":16},{"name":834,"slug":835,"type":16},"Technical Writing","technical-writing","2026-04-06T17:56:14.18897",{"slug":522,"name":522,"fn":838,"description":839,"org":840,"tags":841,"stars":780,"repoUrl":781,"updatedAt":854},"create and edit Word documents","Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files) or Word templates (.dotx files). Triggers include: any mention of 'Word doc', 'word document', '.docx', '.dotx', or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when extracting or reorganizing content from .docx or .dotx files, inserting or replacing images in documents, performing find-and-replace in Word files, working with tracked changes or comments, or converting content into a polished Word document. If the user asks for a 'report', 'memo', 'letter', 'template', or similar deliverable as a Word or .docx file, use this skill. Do NOT use for PDFs, spreadsheets, Google Docs, or general coding tasks unrelated to document generation.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[842,843,845,848,851],{"name":21,"slug":22,"type":16},{"name":844,"slug":522,"type":16},"DOCX",{"name":846,"slug":847,"type":16},"Office","office",{"name":849,"slug":850,"type":16},"Templates","templates",{"name":852,"slug":853,"type":16},"Word","word","2026-07-18T05:16:23.136271",{"slug":856,"name":856,"fn":857,"description":858,"org":859,"tags":860,"stars":780,"repoUrl":781,"updatedAt":874},"frontend-design","design production-grade frontend interfaces","Guidance for distinctive, intentional visual design when building new UI or reshaping an existing one. Helps with aesthetic direction, typography, and making choices that don't read as templated defaults.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[861,862,865,868,871],{"name":655,"slug":656,"type":16},{"name":863,"slug":864,"type":16},"Frontend","frontend",{"name":866,"slug":867,"type":16},"React","react",{"name":869,"slug":870,"type":16},"Tailwind CSS","tailwind-css",{"name":872,"slug":873,"type":16},"UI Components","ui-components","2026-04-06T17:56:16.723469",{"slug":876,"name":876,"fn":877,"description":878,"org":879,"tags":880,"stars":780,"repoUrl":781,"updatedAt":884},"internal-comms","write internal company communications","A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[881,882,883],{"name":754,"slug":755,"type":16},{"name":849,"slug":850,"type":16},{"name":743,"slug":744,"type":16},"2026-04-06T17:56:20.695522",{"slug":886,"name":886,"fn":887,"description":888,"org":889,"tags":890,"stars":780,"repoUrl":781,"updatedAt":899},"mcp-builder","build MCP servers","Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node\u002FTypeScript (MCP SDK).",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[891,892,895,896],{"name":814,"slug":815,"type":16},{"name":893,"slug":894,"type":16},"API Development","api-development",{"name":823,"slug":824,"type":16},{"name":897,"slug":898,"type":16},"MCP","mcp","2026-04-06T17:56:10.357665",{"slug":805,"name":805,"fn":901,"description":902,"org":903,"tags":904,"stars":780,"repoUrl":781,"updatedAt":907},"read edit and manipulate PDF files","Use this skill whenever the user wants to do anything with PDF files. This includes reading or extracting text\u002Ftables from PDFs, combining or merging multiple PDFs into one, splitting PDFs apart, rotating pages, adding watermarks, creating new PDFs, filling PDF forms, encrypting\u002Fdecrypting PDFs, extracting images, and OCR on scanned PDFs to make them searchable. If the user mentions a .pdf file or asks to produce one, use this skill.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[905,906],{"name":21,"slug":22,"type":16},{"name":804,"slug":805,"type":16},"2026-04-06T17:56:02.483316",{"slug":909,"name":909,"fn":910,"description":911,"org":912,"tags":913,"stars":780,"repoUrl":781,"updatedAt":920},"pptx","create and edit PowerPoint presentations","Use this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an email or summary); editing, modifying, or updating existing presentations; combining or splitting slide files; working with templates (.potx), layouts, speaker notes, or comments. Trigger whenever the user mentions \"deck,\" \"slides,\" \"presentation,\" or references a .pptx or .potx filename, regardless of what they plan to do with the content afterward. If a .pptx or .potx file needs to be opened, created, or touched, use this skill.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[914,917],{"name":915,"slug":916,"type":16},"PowerPoint","powerpoint",{"name":918,"slug":919,"type":16},"Presentations","presentations","2026-07-18T05:16:24.1471",{"slug":922,"name":922,"fn":923,"description":924,"org":925,"tags":926,"stars":780,"repoUrl":781,"updatedAt":936},"skill-creator","create and optimize agent skills","Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[927,928,929,932,935],{"name":814,"slug":815,"type":16},{"name":705,"slug":706,"type":16},{"name":930,"slug":931,"type":16},"Evals","evals",{"name":933,"slug":934,"type":16},"Performance","performance",{"name":834,"slug":835,"type":16},"2026-04-19T06:45:40.804",490]