[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill-anthropic-competitive-analysis":3,"mdc-y0g817-key":36,"related-org-anthropic-competitive-analysis":1341,"related-repo-anthropic-competitive-analysis":1525},{"slug":4,"name":4,"fn":5,"description":6,"org":7,"tags":12,"stars":26,"repoUrl":27,"updatedAt":28,"license":29,"forks":30,"topics":31,"repo":32,"sourceUrl":34,"mdContent":35},"competitive-analysis","build competitive landscape decks","Framework for building competitive landscape decks — market positioning, competitor deep-dives, comparative analysis, strategic synthesis. Use when the user asks for a competitive landscape, competitor analysis, peer comparison, market positioning assessment, strategic review, or investment memo deck. Also triggers on \"who are the competitors to X\", \"benchmark X against peers\", \"build a market map\", or any request to systematically evaluate competitive dynamics across an industry.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},"anthropic","Anthropic","https:\u002F\u002Fpexgzepcugksgbtrxkhf.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Forg-logos\u002Fanthropic.png","anthropics",[13,17,20,23],{"name":14,"slug":15,"type":16},"Competitive Intelligence","competitive-intelligence","tag",{"name":18,"slug":19,"type":16},"Marketing","marketing",{"name":21,"slug":22,"type":16},"Presentations","presentations",{"name":24,"slug":25,"type":16},"Strategy","strategy",33636,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fanthropics\u002Ffinancial-services","2026-05-15T06:09:18.300438",null,4964,[],{"repoUrl":27,"stars":26,"forks":30,"topics":33,"description":29},[],"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fanthropics\u002Ffinancial-services\u002Ftree\u002FHEAD\u002Fplugins\u002Fagent-plugins\u002Fmarket-researcher\u002Fskills\u002Fcompetitive-analysis","---\nname: competitive-analysis\ndescription: Framework for building competitive landscape decks — market positioning, competitor deep-dives, comparative analysis, strategic synthesis. Use when the user asks for a competitive landscape, competitor analysis, peer comparison, market positioning assessment, strategic review, or investment memo deck. Also triggers on \"who are the competitors to X\", \"benchmark X against peers\", \"build a market map\", or any request to systematically evaluate competitive dynamics across an industry.\n---\n\n# Competitive Landscape Mapping\n\nBuild a complete competitive analysis deck. This is a two-phase process: gather requirements and get outline approval first, then build.\n\n## Environment check\n\nThis skill works in both the PowerPoint add-in and chat. Identify which you're in before starting — the mechanics differ, the workflow doesn't:\n\n- **Add-in** — the deck is open live; build slides directly into it.\n- **Chat** — generate a `.pptx` file (or build into one the user uploaded).\n\nEverything below applies in both.\n\n## Phase 1 — Scope the analysis\n\nCompetitive analysis means different things to different people. Before any research or slide-building, use `ask_user_question` to pin down what they actually want. Don't guess — a 20-slide peer benchmarking deck and a 5-slide market map are both \"competitive analysis\" and take completely different shapes.\n\nGather in one round if you can (the tool takes up to 4 questions):\n\n- **Scope** — Single target company with competitors around it? Or multi-company side-by-side with no protagonist?\n- **Competitor set** — Which companies are in scope? If the user names them, use exactly those. If they say \"the usual suspects,\" propose a set and confirm.\n- **Audience and depth** — Quick read for someone already in the space, or a full primer? This drives whether you need market sizing, industry economics, and history — or can skip to the comparison.\n- **Investment context** — Do they need bull\u002Fbase\u002Fbear scenarios and signposts? That's Step 9 below; skip it if this is a strategic review rather than an investment thesis.\n\nIf they've uploaded an Excel\u002FCSV with competitor data, confirm which columns map to which metrics before you start pulling numbers. Source-file fidelity matters: use values exactly as given, don't recalculate or re-round.\n\n## Phase 2 — Outline, approve, then build\n\n**Do not create slides until the outline is approved.** Propose slide titles and one-line content notes, present them to the user, get a yes. A competitive deck is 10-20 slides of interlocking content — rebuilding because slide 4 was wrong is expensive. The outline is the cheap iteration point.\n\nWhen proposing the outline, `ask_user_question` works well for the structural decisions: which positioning visualization (2×2 matrix \u002F radar \u002F tier diagram — Step 5 below), how to group competitors (by business model \u002F segment \u002F posture — Step 4). These are taste calls the user likely has an opinion on.\n\n---\n\n## Standards — apply throughout\n\n### Prompt fidelity\n\nWhen the user specifies something, that's a requirement, not a suggestion:\n- **Slide titles and section names** — exact wording. If they say \"Overview and Competitive Scope,\" don't swap in \"FY2024 Competitive Landscape.\"\n- **Chart vs. table** — not interchangeable. \"Embedded chart\" means a real chart object with data labels on the bars\u002Fslices, not a formatted table.\n- **Complete data series** — if they list 7 competitors, include all 7. If they show 2015-2025, include every year.\n- **Exact values and ratios** — \"surpasses DoorDash 4:1, Lyft 8:1\" means those ratios, not \"7.6x Lyft.\"\n\n### Source quality, when sources conflict\n\n1. 10-Ks \u002F annual reports (audited)\n2. Earnings calls \u002F investor presentations (management commentary)\n3. Sell-side research (analyst estimates, useful for private company sizing)\n4. Industry reports (McKinsey, Gartner — market sizing, trends)\n5. News (recent developments only; verify against primary sources)\n\n### Data comparability\n\n- All competitor metrics from the same fiscal year; flag exceptions explicitly (\"FY24\" vs \"H1 2024\")\n- Same metric definitions across competitors\n- Convert to USD for international; note the exchange rate and date\n- Missing data shows as \"-\" or \"N\u002FA\" with an \"[E]\" flag for estimates — never blank\n- Every number has a citation: \"[Company] [Document] ([Date])\"\n\n### Design\n\n- **Slide titles are insights, not labels.** \"Scale leaders pulling away from niche players\" — not \"Competitive Analysis.\"\n- **Signposts are quantified.** \"Margin below 40%\" — not \"margins decline.\"\n- **Ratings show the actual.** \"●●● $160B\" — not just \"●●●.\"\n- **Charts are real chart objects** — not text tables dressed up to look like charts.\n\n**Typography** — set explicitly, don't rely on defaults:\n- Slide titles: 28-32pt bold\n- Section headers: 18-20pt bold\n- Body text: 14-16pt (never below 14pt)\n- Table text: 14pt\n- Sources\u002Ffootnotes: 14pt, gray\n- Same element type = same size throughout the deck\n\n**Charts:**\n- Legend inside the chart boundary, not floating over the plot area\n- Right-side legend for pies (≤6 slices), bottom legend for line\u002Fbar (≤4 series)\n- More than 6 series → split into multiple charts or use a table\n- Pie charts show percentages on slices, not just in the legend\n\n**Tables:**\n- Light gray header row, bold\n- Right-align numbers, left-align text\n- Enough cell padding that text doesn't touch borders\n\n**Color:** 2-3 colors max. Muted — navy, gray, one accent. Same color meanings throughout.\n\n### What's strict vs. flexible\n\n| Always | Case-by-case |\n|---|---|\n| Exact titles\u002Fsections when user specifies | Creative titles when they don't |\n| Chart when user says chart; table when they say table | Visualization type when unspecified |\n| Every competitor\u002Fdata point they list | Number of competitors when unspecified |\n| Exact values when specified | Rounding when precision unspecified |\n| Titles fit without overflow | Number of competitor categories |\n| No overlapping elements | Which dimensions to compare |\n\n---\n\n## Analysis workflow\n\n### Step 0 — Industry-defining metrics\n\nBefore anything else: what 3-5 metrics does this industry actually run on? Use these consistently across every competitor.\n\n| Industry | Key metrics |\n|---|---|\n| SaaS | ARR, NRR, CAC payback, LTV\u002FCAC, Rule of 40 |\n| Payments | GPV, take rate, attach rate, transaction margin |\n| Marketplaces | GMV, take rate, buyer\u002Fseller ratio, repeat rate |\n| Retail | Same-store sales, inventory turns, sales per sq ft |\n| Logistics | Volume, cost per unit, on-time delivery %, capacity utilization |\n\nIndustry not listed — pick the metrics investors and operators benchmark on.\n\n### Step 1 — Market context\n\nSize, growth, drivers, headwinds. With sources.\n\nCorrect: \"Embedded payments is $80-100B in 2024, growing 20-25% CAGR (McKinsey 2024)\"\nWrong: \"The market is large and growing rapidly\"\n\n### Step 2 — Industry economics\n\nMap how value flows. Approach depends on industry structure:\n- **Vertically structured** — value chain layers, typical margin at each\n- **Platform\u002Fnetwork** — ecosystem participants, value flows between them\n- **Fragmented** — consolidation dynamics, margin differences by scale\n\n### Step 3 — Target company profile\n\n```\n| Metric | Value |\n|---|---|\n| Revenue | $4.96B |\n| Growth | +26% YoY |\n| Gross Margin | 45% |\n| Profitability | $373M Adj. EBITDA |\n| Customers | 134K |\n| Retention | 92% |\n| Market Share | ~15% |\n```\n\nMulti-segment companies add a breakdown:\n\n```\n| Segment | Revenue | Rev YoY | Rev % | EBITDA | EBITDA YoY | Margin |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| Seg A | $25.1B | +26% | 57% | $6.5B | +31% | 26% |\n| Seg B | $13.8B | +31% | 31% | $2.5B | +64% | 18% |\n| Seg C | $5.1B | -2% | 12% | -$74M | -16% | -1% |\n| Total | $44.0B | +18% | 100% | $6.5B* | - | 15% |\n```\n*Note corporate costs if applicable\n\n### Step 4 — Competitor mapping\n\nGroup by whichever lens fits (this is a good `ask_user_question` decision if the user hasn't specified):\n- By business model — platform \u002F vertical \u002F horizontal\n- By segment — enterprise \u002F SMB \u002F consumer\n- By posture — direct \u002F adjacent \u002F emerging\n- By origin — incumbent \u002F disruptor \u002F new entrant\n\n### Step 5 — Positioning visualization\n\n| Type | When |\n|---|---|\n| 2×2 matrix | Two dominant competitive factors |\n| Radar\u002Fspider | Multi-factor comparison |\n| Tier diagram | Natural clustering into strategic groups |\n| Value chain map | Vertical industries |\n| Ecosystem map | Platform markets |\n\nSee `references\u002Fframeworks.md` for 2×2 axis pairs by industry.\n\n### Step 6 — Competitor deep-dives\n\nTwo tables per competitor.\n\n**Metrics:**\n```\n| Metric | Value |\n|---|---|\n| Revenue | $X.XB |\n| Growth | +XX% YoY |\n| Gross Margin | XX% |\n| Market Cap | $X.XB |\n| Profitability | $XXXM EBITDA |\n| Customers | XXK |\n| Retention | XX% |\n| Market Share | ~XX% |\n```\n\n**Qualitative:**\n```\n| Category | Assessment |\n|---|---|\n| Business | What they do (1 sentence) |\n| Strengths | 2-3 bullets |\n| Weaknesses | 2-3 bullets |\n| Strategy | Current priorities |\n```\n\n### Step 7 — Comparative analysis\n\n```\n| Dimension | Company A | Company B | Company C |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| Scale | ●●● $160B | ●●○ $45B | ●○○ $8B |\n| Growth | ●●○ +26% | ●●● +35% | ●●○ +22% |\n| Margins | ●●○ 7.5% | ●○○ 3.2% | ●●● 15% |\n```\n\n### Step 8 — Strategic context\n\nM&A transactions (multiples, rationale), partnership trends, capital raising patterns, regulatory developments. See `references\u002Fschemas.md` for the M&A transaction table format.\n\n### Step 9 — Synthesis\n\n**Moat assessment** — rate each competitor Strong \u002F Moderate \u002F Weak on:\n\n| Moat | What to assess |\n|---|---|\n| Network effects | User\u002Fsupplier flywheel strength; cross-side vs same-side |\n| Switching costs | Technical integration depth, contractual lock-in, behavioral habits |\n| Scale economies | Unit cost advantages at volume; minimum efficient scale |\n| Intangible assets | Brand, proprietary data, regulatory licenses, patents |\n\n**Required synthesis elements:**\n- Durable advantages (hard to replicate) — map to moat categories\n- Structural vulnerabilities (hard to fix)\n- Current state vs. trajectory\n\n**For investment contexts** (skip if the Phase 1 scoping said no):\n\n```\n| Scenario | Probability | Key driver |\n|---|---|---|\n| Bull | 30% | Market share gains, margin expansion |\n| Base | 50% | Current trajectory continues |\n| Bear | 20% | Competitive pressure, margin compression |\n```\n\n---\n\n## Quality checklist\n\nBefore finishing:\n\n**Prompt fidelity**\n- Slide titles match what the user specified, verbatim\n- Charts where they said chart; tables where they said table\n- Every competitor\u002Fyear\u002Fdata point they listed is present\n- Exact values and formats as specified\n\n**Data consistency**\n- Source-file values extracted directly, not recalculated\n- Same metric shows the same value on every slide it appears\n- Same decimal precision as the source\n\n**Layout**\n- Titles fit without overflow\n- No overlapping elements\n- All text within containers, no clipping\n\n**Content**\n- Every number has a citation\n- All metrics from the same fiscal period (or flagged)\n- Slide titles state insights, not topics\n- Charts are real chart objects\n\nRun standard visual verification checks on every slide — this catches overlaps, overflow, and low-contrast text that don't show up when you're reading back the XML.\n",{"data":37,"body":38},{"name":4,"description":6},{"type":39,"children":40},"root",[41,50,56,63,68,103,108,114,127,132,175,180,186,196,208,212,218,225,230,273,279,308,314,371,377,420,430,463,471,494,502,520,530,536,642,645,651,657,662,749,754,760,765,770,776,781,814,820,832,837,846,851,857,869,892,898,985,998,1004,1009,1017,1026,1034,1043,1049,1058,1064,1077,1083,1093,1167,1175,1193,1203,1212,1215,1221,1226,1233,1256,1264,1282,1290,1306,1314,1336],{"type":42,"tag":43,"props":44,"children":46},"element","h1",{"id":45},"competitive-landscape-mapping",[47],{"type":48,"value":49},"text","Competitive Landscape Mapping",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":52,"children":53},"p",{},[54],{"type":48,"value":55},"Build a complete competitive analysis deck. This is a two-phase process: gather requirements and get outline approval first, then build.",{"type":42,"tag":57,"props":58,"children":60},"h2",{"id":59},"environment-check",[61],{"type":48,"value":62},"Environment check",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":64,"children":65},{},[66],{"type":48,"value":67},"This skill works in both the PowerPoint add-in and chat. Identify which you're in before starting — the mechanics differ, the workflow doesn't:",{"type":42,"tag":69,"props":70,"children":71},"ul",{},[72,84],{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":74,"children":75},"li",{},[76,82],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":78,"children":79},"strong",{},[80],{"type":48,"value":81},"Add-in",{"type":48,"value":83}," — the deck is open live; build slides directly into it.",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":85,"children":86},{},[87,92,94,101],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":88,"children":89},{},[90],{"type":48,"value":91},"Chat",{"type":48,"value":93}," — generate a ",{"type":42,"tag":95,"props":96,"children":98},"code",{"className":97},[],[99],{"type":48,"value":100},".pptx",{"type":48,"value":102}," file (or build into one the user uploaded).",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":104,"children":105},{},[106],{"type":48,"value":107},"Everything below applies in both.",{"type":42,"tag":57,"props":109,"children":111},{"id":110},"phase-1-scope-the-analysis",[112],{"type":48,"value":113},"Phase 1 — Scope the analysis",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":115,"children":116},{},[117,119,125],{"type":48,"value":118},"Competitive analysis means different things to different people. Before any research or slide-building, use ",{"type":42,"tag":95,"props":120,"children":122},{"className":121},[],[123],{"type":48,"value":124},"ask_user_question",{"type":48,"value":126}," to pin down what they actually want. Don't guess — a 20-slide peer benchmarking deck and a 5-slide market map are both \"competitive analysis\" and take completely different shapes.",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":128,"children":129},{},[130],{"type":48,"value":131},"Gather in one round if you can (the tool takes up to 4 questions):",{"type":42,"tag":69,"props":133,"children":134},{},[135,145,155,165],{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":136,"children":137},{},[138,143],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":139,"children":140},{},[141],{"type":48,"value":142},"Scope",{"type":48,"value":144}," — Single target company with competitors around it? Or multi-company side-by-side with no protagonist?",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":146,"children":147},{},[148,153],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":149,"children":150},{},[151],{"type":48,"value":152},"Competitor set",{"type":48,"value":154}," — Which companies are in scope? If the user names them, use exactly those. If they say \"the usual suspects,\" propose a set and confirm.",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":156,"children":157},{},[158,163],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":159,"children":160},{},[161],{"type":48,"value":162},"Audience and depth",{"type":48,"value":164}," — Quick read for someone already in the space, or a full primer? This drives whether you need market sizing, industry economics, and history — or can skip to the comparison.",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":166,"children":167},{},[168,173],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":169,"children":170},{},[171],{"type":48,"value":172},"Investment context",{"type":48,"value":174}," — Do they need bull\u002Fbase\u002Fbear scenarios and signposts? That's Step 9 below; skip it if this is a strategic review rather than an investment thesis.",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":176,"children":177},{},[178],{"type":48,"value":179},"If they've uploaded an Excel\u002FCSV with competitor data, confirm which columns map to which metrics before you start pulling numbers. Source-file fidelity matters: use values exactly as given, don't recalculate or re-round.",{"type":42,"tag":57,"props":181,"children":183},{"id":182},"phase-2-outline-approve-then-build",[184],{"type":48,"value":185},"Phase 2 — Outline, approve, then build",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":187,"children":188},{},[189,194],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":190,"children":191},{},[192],{"type":48,"value":193},"Do not create slides until the outline is approved.",{"type":48,"value":195}," Propose slide titles and one-line content notes, present them to the user, get a yes. A competitive deck is 10-20 slides of interlocking content — rebuilding because slide 4 was wrong is expensive. The outline is the cheap iteration point.",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":197,"children":198},{},[199,201,206],{"type":48,"value":200},"When proposing the outline, ",{"type":42,"tag":95,"props":202,"children":204},{"className":203},[],[205],{"type":48,"value":124},{"type":48,"value":207}," works well for the structural decisions: which positioning visualization (2×2 matrix \u002F radar \u002F tier diagram — Step 5 below), how to group competitors (by business model \u002F segment \u002F posture — Step 4). These are taste calls the user likely has an opinion on.",{"type":42,"tag":209,"props":210,"children":211},"hr",{},[],{"type":42,"tag":57,"props":213,"children":215},{"id":214},"standards-apply-throughout",[216],{"type":48,"value":217},"Standards — apply throughout",{"type":42,"tag":219,"props":220,"children":222},"h3",{"id":221},"prompt-fidelity",[223],{"type":48,"value":224},"Prompt fidelity",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":226,"children":227},{},[228],{"type":48,"value":229},"When the user specifies something, that's a requirement, not a suggestion:",{"type":42,"tag":69,"props":231,"children":232},{},[233,243,253,263],{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":234,"children":235},{},[236,241],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":237,"children":238},{},[239],{"type":48,"value":240},"Slide titles and section names",{"type":48,"value":242}," — exact wording. If they say \"Overview and Competitive Scope,\" don't swap in \"FY2024 Competitive Landscape.\"",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":244,"children":245},{},[246,251],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":247,"children":248},{},[249],{"type":48,"value":250},"Chart vs. table",{"type":48,"value":252}," — not interchangeable. \"Embedded chart\" means a real chart object with data labels on the bars\u002Fslices, not a formatted table.",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":254,"children":255},{},[256,261],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":257,"children":258},{},[259],{"type":48,"value":260},"Complete data series",{"type":48,"value":262}," — if they list 7 competitors, include all 7. If they show 2015-2025, include every year.",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":264,"children":265},{},[266,271],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":267,"children":268},{},[269],{"type":48,"value":270},"Exact values and ratios",{"type":48,"value":272}," — \"surpasses DoorDash 4:1, Lyft 8:1\" means those ratios, not \"7.6x Lyft.\"",{"type":42,"tag":219,"props":274,"children":276},{"id":275},"source-quality-when-sources-conflict",[277],{"type":48,"value":278},"Source quality, when sources conflict",{"type":42,"tag":280,"props":281,"children":282},"ol",{},[283,288,293,298,303],{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":284,"children":285},{},[286],{"type":48,"value":287},"10-Ks \u002F annual reports (audited)",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":289,"children":290},{},[291],{"type":48,"value":292},"Earnings calls \u002F investor presentations (management commentary)",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":294,"children":295},{},[296],{"type":48,"value":297},"Sell-side research (analyst estimates, useful for private company sizing)",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":299,"children":300},{},[301],{"type":48,"value":302},"Industry reports (McKinsey, Gartner — market sizing, trends)",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":304,"children":305},{},[306],{"type":48,"value":307},"News (recent developments only; verify against primary sources)",{"type":42,"tag":219,"props":309,"children":311},{"id":310},"data-comparability",[312],{"type":48,"value":313},"Data comparability",{"type":42,"tag":69,"props":315,"children":316},{},[317,322,327,332,345],{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":318,"children":319},{},[320],{"type":48,"value":321},"All competitor metrics from the same fiscal year; flag exceptions explicitly (\"FY24\" vs \"H1 2024\")",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":323,"children":324},{},[325],{"type":48,"value":326},"Same metric definitions across competitors",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":328,"children":329},{},[330],{"type":48,"value":331},"Convert to USD for international; note the exchange rate and date",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":333,"children":334},{},[335,337,343],{"type":48,"value":336},"Missing data shows as \"-\" or \"N\u002FA\" with an \"",{"type":42,"tag":338,"props":339,"children":340},"span",{},[341],{"type":48,"value":342},"E",{"type":48,"value":344},"\" flag for estimates — never blank",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":346,"children":347},{},[348,350,355,357,362,364,369],{"type":48,"value":349},"Every number has a citation: \"",{"type":42,"tag":338,"props":351,"children":352},{},[353],{"type":48,"value":354},"Company",{"type":48,"value":356}," ",{"type":42,"tag":338,"props":358,"children":359},{},[360],{"type":48,"value":361},"Document",{"type":48,"value":363}," (",{"type":42,"tag":338,"props":365,"children":366},{},[367],{"type":48,"value":368},"Date",{"type":48,"value":370},")\"",{"type":42,"tag":219,"props":372,"children":374},{"id":373},"design",[375],{"type":48,"value":376},"Design",{"type":42,"tag":69,"props":378,"children":379},{},[380,390,400,410],{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":381,"children":382},{},[383,388],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":384,"children":385},{},[386],{"type":48,"value":387},"Slide titles are insights, not labels.",{"type":48,"value":389}," \"Scale leaders pulling away from niche players\" — not \"Competitive Analysis.\"",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":391,"children":392},{},[393,398],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":394,"children":395},{},[396],{"type":48,"value":397},"Signposts are quantified.",{"type":48,"value":399}," \"Margin below 40%\" — not \"margins decline.\"",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":401,"children":402},{},[403,408],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":404,"children":405},{},[406],{"type":48,"value":407},"Ratings show the actual.",{"type":48,"value":409}," \"●●● $160B\" — not just \"●●●.\"",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":411,"children":412},{},[413,418],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":414,"children":415},{},[416],{"type":48,"value":417},"Charts are real chart objects",{"type":48,"value":419}," — not text tables dressed up to look like charts.",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":421,"children":422},{},[423,428],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":424,"children":425},{},[426],{"type":48,"value":427},"Typography",{"type":48,"value":429}," — set explicitly, don't rely on defaults:",{"type":42,"tag":69,"props":431,"children":432},{},[433,438,443,448,453,458],{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":434,"children":435},{},[436],{"type":48,"value":437},"Slide titles: 28-32pt bold",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":439,"children":440},{},[441],{"type":48,"value":442},"Section headers: 18-20pt bold",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":444,"children":445},{},[446],{"type":48,"value":447},"Body text: 14-16pt (never below 14pt)",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":449,"children":450},{},[451],{"type":48,"value":452},"Table text: 14pt",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":454,"children":455},{},[456],{"type":48,"value":457},"Sources\u002Ffootnotes: 14pt, gray",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":459,"children":460},{},[461],{"type":48,"value":462},"Same element type = same size throughout the deck",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":464,"children":465},{},[466],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":467,"children":468},{},[469],{"type":48,"value":470},"Charts:",{"type":42,"tag":69,"props":472,"children":473},{},[474,479,484,489],{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":475,"children":476},{},[477],{"type":48,"value":478},"Legend inside the chart boundary, not floating over the plot area",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":480,"children":481},{},[482],{"type":48,"value":483},"Right-side legend for pies (≤6 slices), bottom legend for line\u002Fbar (≤4 series)",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":485,"children":486},{},[487],{"type":48,"value":488},"More than 6 series → split into multiple charts or use a table",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":490,"children":491},{},[492],{"type":48,"value":493},"Pie charts show percentages on slices, not just in the legend",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":495,"children":496},{},[497],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":498,"children":499},{},[500],{"type":48,"value":501},"Tables:",{"type":42,"tag":69,"props":503,"children":504},{},[505,510,515],{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":506,"children":507},{},[508],{"type":48,"value":509},"Light gray header row, bold",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":511,"children":512},{},[513],{"type":48,"value":514},"Right-align numbers, left-align text",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":516,"children":517},{},[518],{"type":48,"value":519},"Enough cell padding that text doesn't touch borders",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":521,"children":522},{},[523,528],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":524,"children":525},{},[526],{"type":48,"value":527},"Color:",{"type":48,"value":529}," 2-3 colors max. Muted — navy, gray, one accent. Same color meanings throughout.",{"type":42,"tag":219,"props":531,"children":533},{"id":532},"whats-strict-vs-flexible",[534],{"type":48,"value":535},"What's strict vs. flexible",{"type":42,"tag":537,"props":538,"children":539},"table",{},[540,559],{"type":42,"tag":541,"props":542,"children":543},"thead",{},[544],{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":546,"children":547},"tr",{},[548,554],{"type":42,"tag":549,"props":550,"children":551},"th",{},[552],{"type":48,"value":553},"Always",{"type":42,"tag":549,"props":555,"children":556},{},[557],{"type":48,"value":558},"Case-by-case",{"type":42,"tag":560,"props":561,"children":562},"tbody",{},[563,577,590,603,616,629],{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":564,"children":565},{},[566,572],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":568,"children":569},"td",{},[570],{"type":48,"value":571},"Exact titles\u002Fsections when user specifies",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":573,"children":574},{},[575],{"type":48,"value":576},"Creative titles when they don't",{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":578,"children":579},{},[580,585],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":581,"children":582},{},[583],{"type":48,"value":584},"Chart when user says chart; table when they say table",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":586,"children":587},{},[588],{"type":48,"value":589},"Visualization type when unspecified",{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":591,"children":592},{},[593,598],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":594,"children":595},{},[596],{"type":48,"value":597},"Every competitor\u002Fdata point they list",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":599,"children":600},{},[601],{"type":48,"value":602},"Number of competitors when unspecified",{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":604,"children":605},{},[606,611],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":607,"children":608},{},[609],{"type":48,"value":610},"Exact values when specified",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":612,"children":613},{},[614],{"type":48,"value":615},"Rounding when precision unspecified",{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":617,"children":618},{},[619,624],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":620,"children":621},{},[622],{"type":48,"value":623},"Titles fit without overflow",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":625,"children":626},{},[627],{"type":48,"value":628},"Number of competitor categories",{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":630,"children":631},{},[632,637],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":633,"children":634},{},[635],{"type":48,"value":636},"No overlapping elements",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":638,"children":639},{},[640],{"type":48,"value":641},"Which dimensions to compare",{"type":42,"tag":209,"props":643,"children":644},{},[],{"type":42,"tag":57,"props":646,"children":648},{"id":647},"analysis-workflow",[649],{"type":48,"value":650},"Analysis workflow",{"type":42,"tag":219,"props":652,"children":654},{"id":653},"step-0-industry-defining-metrics",[655],{"type":48,"value":656},"Step 0 — Industry-defining metrics",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":658,"children":659},{},[660],{"type":48,"value":661},"Before anything else: what 3-5 metrics does this industry actually run on? Use these consistently across every competitor.",{"type":42,"tag":537,"props":663,"children":664},{},[665,681],{"type":42,"tag":541,"props":666,"children":667},{},[668],{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":669,"children":670},{},[671,676],{"type":42,"tag":549,"props":672,"children":673},{},[674],{"type":48,"value":675},"Industry",{"type":42,"tag":549,"props":677,"children":678},{},[679],{"type":48,"value":680},"Key metrics",{"type":42,"tag":560,"props":682,"children":683},{},[684,697,710,723,736],{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":685,"children":686},{},[687,692],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":688,"children":689},{},[690],{"type":48,"value":691},"SaaS",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":693,"children":694},{},[695],{"type":48,"value":696},"ARR, NRR, CAC payback, LTV\u002FCAC, Rule of 40",{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":698,"children":699},{},[700,705],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":701,"children":702},{},[703],{"type":48,"value":704},"Payments",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":706,"children":707},{},[708],{"type":48,"value":709},"GPV, take rate, attach rate, transaction margin",{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":711,"children":712},{},[713,718],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":714,"children":715},{},[716],{"type":48,"value":717},"Marketplaces",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":719,"children":720},{},[721],{"type":48,"value":722},"GMV, take rate, buyer\u002Fseller ratio, repeat rate",{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":724,"children":725},{},[726,731],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":727,"children":728},{},[729],{"type":48,"value":730},"Retail",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":732,"children":733},{},[734],{"type":48,"value":735},"Same-store sales, inventory turns, sales per sq ft",{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":737,"children":738},{},[739,744],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":740,"children":741},{},[742],{"type":48,"value":743},"Logistics",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":745,"children":746},{},[747],{"type":48,"value":748},"Volume, cost per unit, on-time delivery %, capacity utilization",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":750,"children":751},{},[752],{"type":48,"value":753},"Industry not listed — pick the metrics investors and operators benchmark on.",{"type":42,"tag":219,"props":755,"children":757},{"id":756},"step-1-market-context",[758],{"type":48,"value":759},"Step 1 — Market context",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":761,"children":762},{},[763],{"type":48,"value":764},"Size, growth, drivers, headwinds. With sources.",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":766,"children":767},{},[768],{"type":48,"value":769},"Correct: \"Embedded payments is $80-100B in 2024, growing 20-25% CAGR (McKinsey 2024)\"\nWrong: \"The market is large and growing rapidly\"",{"type":42,"tag":219,"props":771,"children":773},{"id":772},"step-2-industry-economics",[774],{"type":48,"value":775},"Step 2 — Industry economics",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":777,"children":778},{},[779],{"type":48,"value":780},"Map how value flows. Approach depends on industry structure:",{"type":42,"tag":69,"props":782,"children":783},{},[784,794,804],{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":785,"children":786},{},[787,792],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":788,"children":789},{},[790],{"type":48,"value":791},"Vertically structured",{"type":48,"value":793}," — value chain layers, typical margin at each",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":795,"children":796},{},[797,802],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":798,"children":799},{},[800],{"type":48,"value":801},"Platform\u002Fnetwork",{"type":48,"value":803}," — ecosystem participants, value flows between them",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":805,"children":806},{},[807,812],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":808,"children":809},{},[810],{"type":48,"value":811},"Fragmented",{"type":48,"value":813}," — consolidation dynamics, margin differences by scale",{"type":42,"tag":219,"props":815,"children":817},{"id":816},"step-3-target-company-profile",[818],{"type":48,"value":819},"Step 3 — Target company profile",{"type":42,"tag":821,"props":822,"children":826},"pre",{"className":823,"code":825,"language":48},[824],"language-text","| Metric | Value |\n|---|---|\n| Revenue | $4.96B |\n| Growth | +26% YoY |\n| Gross Margin | 45% |\n| Profitability | $373M Adj. EBITDA |\n| Customers | 134K |\n| Retention | 92% |\n| Market Share | ~15% |\n",[827],{"type":42,"tag":95,"props":828,"children":830},{"__ignoreMap":829},"",[831],{"type":48,"value":825},{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":833,"children":834},{},[835],{"type":48,"value":836},"Multi-segment companies add a breakdown:",{"type":42,"tag":821,"props":838,"children":841},{"className":839,"code":840,"language":48},[824],"| Segment | Revenue | Rev YoY | Rev % | EBITDA | EBITDA YoY | Margin |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| Seg A | $25.1B | +26% | 57% | $6.5B | +31% | 26% |\n| Seg B | $13.8B | +31% | 31% | $2.5B | +64% | 18% |\n| Seg C | $5.1B | -2% | 12% | -$74M | -16% | -1% |\n| Total | $44.0B | +18% | 100% | $6.5B* | - | 15% |\n",[842],{"type":42,"tag":95,"props":843,"children":844},{"__ignoreMap":829},[845],{"type":48,"value":840},{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":847,"children":848},{},[849],{"type":48,"value":850},"*Note corporate costs if applicable",{"type":42,"tag":219,"props":852,"children":854},{"id":853},"step-4-competitor-mapping",[855],{"type":48,"value":856},"Step 4 — Competitor mapping",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":858,"children":859},{},[860,862,867],{"type":48,"value":861},"Group by whichever lens fits (this is a good ",{"type":42,"tag":95,"props":863,"children":865},{"className":864},[],[866],{"type":48,"value":124},{"type":48,"value":868}," decision if the user hasn't specified):",{"type":42,"tag":69,"props":870,"children":871},{},[872,877,882,887],{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":873,"children":874},{},[875],{"type":48,"value":876},"By business model — platform \u002F vertical \u002F horizontal",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":878,"children":879},{},[880],{"type":48,"value":881},"By segment — enterprise \u002F SMB \u002F consumer",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":883,"children":884},{},[885],{"type":48,"value":886},"By posture — direct \u002F adjacent \u002F emerging",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":888,"children":889},{},[890],{"type":48,"value":891},"By origin — incumbent \u002F disruptor \u002F new entrant",{"type":42,"tag":219,"props":893,"children":895},{"id":894},"step-5-positioning-visualization",[896],{"type":48,"value":897},"Step 5 — Positioning visualization",{"type":42,"tag":537,"props":899,"children":900},{},[901,917],{"type":42,"tag":541,"props":902,"children":903},{},[904],{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":905,"children":906},{},[907,912],{"type":42,"tag":549,"props":908,"children":909},{},[910],{"type":48,"value":911},"Type",{"type":42,"tag":549,"props":913,"children":914},{},[915],{"type":48,"value":916},"When",{"type":42,"tag":560,"props":918,"children":919},{},[920,933,946,959,972],{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":921,"children":922},{},[923,928],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":924,"children":925},{},[926],{"type":48,"value":927},"2×2 matrix",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":929,"children":930},{},[931],{"type":48,"value":932},"Two dominant competitive factors",{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":934,"children":935},{},[936,941],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":937,"children":938},{},[939],{"type":48,"value":940},"Radar\u002Fspider",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":942,"children":943},{},[944],{"type":48,"value":945},"Multi-factor comparison",{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":947,"children":948},{},[949,954],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":950,"children":951},{},[952],{"type":48,"value":953},"Tier diagram",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":955,"children":956},{},[957],{"type":48,"value":958},"Natural clustering into strategic groups",{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":960,"children":961},{},[962,967],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":963,"children":964},{},[965],{"type":48,"value":966},"Value chain map",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":968,"children":969},{},[970],{"type":48,"value":971},"Vertical industries",{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":973,"children":974},{},[975,980],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":976,"children":977},{},[978],{"type":48,"value":979},"Ecosystem map",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":981,"children":982},{},[983],{"type":48,"value":984},"Platform markets",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":986,"children":987},{},[988,990,996],{"type":48,"value":989},"See ",{"type":42,"tag":95,"props":991,"children":993},{"className":992},[],[994],{"type":48,"value":995},"references\u002Fframeworks.md",{"type":48,"value":997}," for 2×2 axis pairs by industry.",{"type":42,"tag":219,"props":999,"children":1001},{"id":1000},"step-6-competitor-deep-dives",[1002],{"type":48,"value":1003},"Step 6 — Competitor deep-dives",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":1005,"children":1006},{},[1007],{"type":48,"value":1008},"Two tables per competitor.",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":1010,"children":1011},{},[1012],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":1013,"children":1014},{},[1015],{"type":48,"value":1016},"Metrics:",{"type":42,"tag":821,"props":1018,"children":1021},{"className":1019,"code":1020,"language":48},[824],"| Metric | Value |\n|---|---|\n| Revenue | $X.XB |\n| Growth | +XX% YoY |\n| Gross Margin | XX% |\n| Market Cap | $X.XB |\n| Profitability | $XXXM EBITDA |\n| Customers | XXK |\n| Retention | XX% |\n| Market Share | ~XX% |\n",[1022],{"type":42,"tag":95,"props":1023,"children":1024},{"__ignoreMap":829},[1025],{"type":48,"value":1020},{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":1027,"children":1028},{},[1029],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":1030,"children":1031},{},[1032],{"type":48,"value":1033},"Qualitative:",{"type":42,"tag":821,"props":1035,"children":1038},{"className":1036,"code":1037,"language":48},[824],"| Category | Assessment |\n|---|---|\n| Business | What they do (1 sentence) |\n| Strengths | 2-3 bullets |\n| Weaknesses | 2-3 bullets |\n| Strategy | Current priorities |\n",[1039],{"type":42,"tag":95,"props":1040,"children":1041},{"__ignoreMap":829},[1042],{"type":48,"value":1037},{"type":42,"tag":219,"props":1044,"children":1046},{"id":1045},"step-7-comparative-analysis",[1047],{"type":48,"value":1048},"Step 7 — Comparative analysis",{"type":42,"tag":821,"props":1050,"children":1053},{"className":1051,"code":1052,"language":48},[824],"| Dimension | Company A | Company B | Company C |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| Scale | ●●● $160B | ●●○ $45B | ●○○ $8B |\n| Growth | ●●○ +26% | ●●● +35% | ●●○ +22% |\n| Margins | ●●○ 7.5% | ●○○ 3.2% | ●●● 15% |\n",[1054],{"type":42,"tag":95,"props":1055,"children":1056},{"__ignoreMap":829},[1057],{"type":48,"value":1052},{"type":42,"tag":219,"props":1059,"children":1061},{"id":1060},"step-8-strategic-context",[1062],{"type":48,"value":1063},"Step 8 — Strategic context",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":1065,"children":1066},{},[1067,1069,1075],{"type":48,"value":1068},"M&A transactions (multiples, rationale), partnership trends, capital raising patterns, regulatory developments. See ",{"type":42,"tag":95,"props":1070,"children":1072},{"className":1071},[],[1073],{"type":48,"value":1074},"references\u002Fschemas.md",{"type":48,"value":1076}," for the M&A transaction table format.",{"type":42,"tag":219,"props":1078,"children":1080},{"id":1079},"step-9-synthesis",[1081],{"type":48,"value":1082},"Step 9 — Synthesis",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":1084,"children":1085},{},[1086,1091],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":1087,"children":1088},{},[1089],{"type":48,"value":1090},"Moat assessment",{"type":48,"value":1092}," — rate each competitor Strong \u002F Moderate \u002F Weak on:",{"type":42,"tag":537,"props":1094,"children":1095},{},[1096,1112],{"type":42,"tag":541,"props":1097,"children":1098},{},[1099],{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":1100,"children":1101},{},[1102,1107],{"type":42,"tag":549,"props":1103,"children":1104},{},[1105],{"type":48,"value":1106},"Moat",{"type":42,"tag":549,"props":1108,"children":1109},{},[1110],{"type":48,"value":1111},"What to assess",{"type":42,"tag":560,"props":1113,"children":1114},{},[1115,1128,1141,1154],{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":1116,"children":1117},{},[1118,1123],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":1119,"children":1120},{},[1121],{"type":48,"value":1122},"Network effects",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":1124,"children":1125},{},[1126],{"type":48,"value":1127},"User\u002Fsupplier flywheel strength; cross-side vs same-side",{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":1129,"children":1130},{},[1131,1136],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":1132,"children":1133},{},[1134],{"type":48,"value":1135},"Switching costs",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":1137,"children":1138},{},[1139],{"type":48,"value":1140},"Technical integration depth, contractual lock-in, behavioral habits",{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":1142,"children":1143},{},[1144,1149],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":1145,"children":1146},{},[1147],{"type":48,"value":1148},"Scale economies",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":1150,"children":1151},{},[1152],{"type":48,"value":1153},"Unit cost advantages at volume; minimum efficient scale",{"type":42,"tag":545,"props":1155,"children":1156},{},[1157,1162],{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":1158,"children":1159},{},[1160],{"type":48,"value":1161},"Intangible assets",{"type":42,"tag":567,"props":1163,"children":1164},{},[1165],{"type":48,"value":1166},"Brand, proprietary data, regulatory licenses, patents",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":1168,"children":1169},{},[1170],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":1171,"children":1172},{},[1173],{"type":48,"value":1174},"Required synthesis elements:",{"type":42,"tag":69,"props":1176,"children":1177},{},[1178,1183,1188],{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":1179,"children":1180},{},[1181],{"type":48,"value":1182},"Durable advantages (hard to replicate) — map to moat categories",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":1184,"children":1185},{},[1186],{"type":48,"value":1187},"Structural vulnerabilities (hard to fix)",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":1189,"children":1190},{},[1191],{"type":48,"value":1192},"Current state vs. trajectory",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":1194,"children":1195},{},[1196,1201],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":1197,"children":1198},{},[1199],{"type":48,"value":1200},"For investment contexts",{"type":48,"value":1202}," (skip if the Phase 1 scoping said no):",{"type":42,"tag":821,"props":1204,"children":1207},{"className":1205,"code":1206,"language":48},[824],"| Scenario | Probability | Key driver |\n|---|---|---|\n| Bull | 30% | Market share gains, margin expansion |\n| Base | 50% | Current trajectory continues |\n| Bear | 20% | Competitive pressure, margin compression |\n",[1208],{"type":42,"tag":95,"props":1209,"children":1210},{"__ignoreMap":829},[1211],{"type":48,"value":1206},{"type":42,"tag":209,"props":1213,"children":1214},{},[],{"type":42,"tag":57,"props":1216,"children":1218},{"id":1217},"quality-checklist",[1219],{"type":48,"value":1220},"Quality checklist",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":1222,"children":1223},{},[1224],{"type":48,"value":1225},"Before finishing:",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":1227,"children":1228},{},[1229],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":1230,"children":1231},{},[1232],{"type":48,"value":224},{"type":42,"tag":69,"props":1234,"children":1235},{},[1236,1241,1246,1251],{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":1237,"children":1238},{},[1239],{"type":48,"value":1240},"Slide titles match what the user specified, verbatim",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":1242,"children":1243},{},[1244],{"type":48,"value":1245},"Charts where they said chart; tables where they said table",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":1247,"children":1248},{},[1249],{"type":48,"value":1250},"Every competitor\u002Fyear\u002Fdata point they listed is present",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":1252,"children":1253},{},[1254],{"type":48,"value":1255},"Exact values and formats as specified",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":1257,"children":1258},{},[1259],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":1260,"children":1261},{},[1262],{"type":48,"value":1263},"Data consistency",{"type":42,"tag":69,"props":1265,"children":1266},{},[1267,1272,1277],{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":1268,"children":1269},{},[1270],{"type":48,"value":1271},"Source-file values extracted directly, not recalculated",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":1273,"children":1274},{},[1275],{"type":48,"value":1276},"Same metric shows the same value on every slide it appears",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":1278,"children":1279},{},[1280],{"type":48,"value":1281},"Same decimal precision as the source",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":1283,"children":1284},{},[1285],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":1286,"children":1287},{},[1288],{"type":48,"value":1289},"Layout",{"type":42,"tag":69,"props":1291,"children":1292},{},[1293,1297,1301],{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":1294,"children":1295},{},[1296],{"type":48,"value":623},{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":1298,"children":1299},{},[1300],{"type":48,"value":636},{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":1302,"children":1303},{},[1304],{"type":48,"value":1305},"All text within containers, no clipping",{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":1307,"children":1308},{},[1309],{"type":42,"tag":77,"props":1310,"children":1311},{},[1312],{"type":48,"value":1313},"Content",{"type":42,"tag":69,"props":1315,"children":1316},{},[1317,1322,1327,1332],{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":1318,"children":1319},{},[1320],{"type":48,"value":1321},"Every number has a citation",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":1323,"children":1324},{},[1325],{"type":48,"value":1326},"All metrics from the same fiscal period (or flagged)",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":1328,"children":1329},{},[1330],{"type":48,"value":1331},"Slide titles state insights, not topics",{"type":42,"tag":73,"props":1333,"children":1334},{},[1335],{"type":48,"value":417},{"type":42,"tag":51,"props":1337,"children":1338},{},[1339],{"type":48,"value":1340},"Run standard visual verification checks on every slide — this catches overlaps, overflow, and low-contrast text that don't show up when you're reading back the XML.",{"items":1342,"total":1524},[1343,1362,1375,1387,1406,1419,1440,1460,1474,1489,1497,1508],{"slug":1344,"name":1344,"fn":1345,"description":1346,"org":1347,"tags":1348,"stars":1359,"repoUrl":1360,"updatedAt":1361},"algorithmic-art","create algorithmic art with p5.js","Creating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems. Create original algorithmic art rather than copying existing artists' work to avoid copyright violations.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1349,1352,1353,1356],{"name":1350,"slug":1351,"type":16},"Creative","creative",{"name":376,"slug":373,"type":16},{"name":1354,"slug":1355,"type":16},"Generative Art","generative-art",{"name":1357,"slug":1358,"type":16},"JavaScript","javascript",161831,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fanthropics\u002Fskills","2026-04-06T17:56:15.455818",{"slug":1363,"name":1363,"fn":1364,"description":1365,"org":1366,"tags":1367,"stars":1359,"repoUrl":1360,"updatedAt":1374},"brand-guidelines","apply Anthropic brand colors and typography","Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1368,1371,1372],{"name":1369,"slug":1370,"type":16},"Branding","branding",{"name":376,"slug":373,"type":16},{"name":427,"slug":1373,"type":16},"typography","2026-04-06T17:56:05.042852",{"slug":1376,"name":1376,"fn":1377,"description":1378,"org":1379,"tags":1380,"stars":1359,"repoUrl":1360,"updatedAt":1386},"canvas-design","create posters and visual art as PNG or PDF","Create beautiful visual art in .png and .pdf documents using design philosophy. You should use this skill when the user asks to create a poster, piece of art, design, or other static piece. Create original visual designs, never copying existing artists' work to avoid copyright violations.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1381,1382,1383],{"name":1350,"slug":1351,"type":16},{"name":376,"slug":373,"type":16},{"name":1384,"slug":1385,"type":16},"PDF","pdf","2026-04-06T17:56:03.794732",{"slug":1388,"name":1388,"fn":1389,"description":1390,"org":1391,"tags":1392,"stars":1359,"repoUrl":1360,"updatedAt":1405},"claude-api","build apps with the Claude API","Reference for the Claude API \u002F Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration.\nTRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it \"looks like a one-liner\" — whenever: the prompt names Claude\u002FAnthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing\u002Fmodel choice\u002Flimits\u002Fcaching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent\u002FMCP\u002Ftool-definition\u002Fmulti-agent\u002FRAG\u002FLLM-judge\u002Fcomputer-use; generate\u002Fsummarize\u002Fextract\u002Fclassify\u002Frewrite\u002Fconverse over NL; debugging refusals\u002Fcutoffs\u002Fstreaming\u002Ftool-calls\u002Ftokens).\nSKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI\u002FGPT\u002FGemini\u002FLlama\u002FMistral\u002FCohere\u002FOllama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1393,1396,1397,1400,1402],{"name":1394,"slug":1395,"type":16},"Agents","agents",{"name":9,"slug":8,"type":16},{"name":1398,"slug":1399,"type":16},"Anthropic SDK","anthropic-sdk",{"name":1401,"slug":1388,"type":16},"Claude API",{"name":1403,"slug":1404,"type":16},"LLM","llm","2026-07-28T05:36:08.213335",{"slug":1407,"name":1407,"fn":1408,"description":1409,"org":1410,"tags":1411,"stars":1359,"repoUrl":1360,"updatedAt":1418},"doc-coauthoring","co-author documentation and technical specs","Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1412,1415],{"name":1413,"slug":1414,"type":16},"Documentation","documentation",{"name":1416,"slug":1417,"type":16},"Technical Writing","technical-writing","2026-04-06T17:56:14.18897",{"slug":1420,"name":1420,"fn":1421,"description":1422,"org":1423,"tags":1424,"stars":1359,"repoUrl":1360,"updatedAt":1439},"docx","create and edit Word documents","Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files) or Word templates (.dotx files). Triggers include: any mention of 'Word doc', 'word document', '.docx', '.dotx', or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when extracting or reorganizing content from .docx or .dotx files, inserting or replacing images in documents, performing find-and-replace in Word files, working with tracked changes or comments, or converting content into a polished Word document. If the user asks for a 'report', 'memo', 'letter', 'template', or similar deliverable as a Word or .docx file, use this skill. Do NOT use for PDFs, spreadsheets, Google Docs, or general coding tasks unrelated to document generation.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1425,1428,1430,1433,1436],{"name":1426,"slug":1427,"type":16},"Documents","documents",{"name":1429,"slug":1420,"type":16},"DOCX",{"name":1431,"slug":1432,"type":16},"Office","office",{"name":1434,"slug":1435,"type":16},"Templates","templates",{"name":1437,"slug":1438,"type":16},"Word","word","2026-07-18T05:16:23.136271",{"slug":1441,"name":1441,"fn":1442,"description":1443,"org":1444,"tags":1445,"stars":1359,"repoUrl":1360,"updatedAt":1459},"frontend-design","design production-grade frontend interfaces","Guidance for distinctive, intentional visual design when building new UI or reshaping an existing one. Helps with aesthetic direction, typography, and making choices that don't read as templated defaults.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1446,1447,1450,1453,1456],{"name":376,"slug":373,"type":16},{"name":1448,"slug":1449,"type":16},"Frontend","frontend",{"name":1451,"slug":1452,"type":16},"React","react",{"name":1454,"slug":1455,"type":16},"Tailwind CSS","tailwind-css",{"name":1457,"slug":1458,"type":16},"UI Components","ui-components","2026-04-06T17:56:16.723469",{"slug":1461,"name":1461,"fn":1462,"description":1463,"org":1464,"tags":1465,"stars":1359,"repoUrl":1360,"updatedAt":1473},"internal-comms","write internal company communications","A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1466,1469,1470],{"name":1467,"slug":1468,"type":16},"Communications","communications",{"name":1434,"slug":1435,"type":16},{"name":1471,"slug":1472,"type":16},"Writing","writing","2026-04-06T17:56:20.695522",{"slug":1475,"name":1475,"fn":1476,"description":1477,"org":1478,"tags":1479,"stars":1359,"repoUrl":1360,"updatedAt":1488},"mcp-builder","build MCP servers","Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node\u002FTypeScript (MCP SDK).",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1480,1481,1484,1485],{"name":1394,"slug":1395,"type":16},{"name":1482,"slug":1483,"type":16},"API Development","api-development",{"name":1403,"slug":1404,"type":16},{"name":1486,"slug":1487,"type":16},"MCP","mcp","2026-04-06T17:56:10.357665",{"slug":1385,"name":1385,"fn":1490,"description":1491,"org":1492,"tags":1493,"stars":1359,"repoUrl":1360,"updatedAt":1496},"read edit and manipulate PDF files","Use this skill whenever the user wants to do anything with PDF files. This includes reading or extracting text\u002Ftables from PDFs, combining or merging multiple PDFs into one, splitting PDFs apart, rotating pages, adding watermarks, creating new PDFs, filling PDF forms, encrypting\u002Fdecrypting PDFs, extracting images, and OCR on scanned PDFs to make them searchable. If the user mentions a .pdf file or asks to produce one, use this skill.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1494,1495],{"name":1426,"slug":1427,"type":16},{"name":1384,"slug":1385,"type":16},"2026-04-06T17:56:02.483316",{"slug":1498,"name":1498,"fn":1499,"description":1500,"org":1501,"tags":1502,"stars":1359,"repoUrl":1360,"updatedAt":1507},"pptx","create and edit PowerPoint presentations","Use this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an email or summary); editing, modifying, or updating existing presentations; combining or splitting slide files; working with templates (.potx), layouts, speaker notes, or comments. Trigger whenever the user mentions \"deck,\" \"slides,\" \"presentation,\" or references a .pptx or .potx filename, regardless of what they plan to do with the content afterward. If a .pptx or .potx file needs to be opened, created, or touched, use this skill.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1503,1506],{"name":1504,"slug":1505,"type":16},"PowerPoint","powerpoint",{"name":21,"slug":22,"type":16},"2026-07-18T05:16:24.1471",{"slug":1509,"name":1509,"fn":1510,"description":1511,"org":1512,"tags":1513,"stars":1359,"repoUrl":1360,"updatedAt":1523},"skill-creator","create and optimize agent skills","Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1514,1515,1516,1519,1522],{"name":1394,"slug":1395,"type":16},{"name":1413,"slug":1414,"type":16},{"name":1517,"slug":1518,"type":16},"Evals","evals",{"name":1520,"slug":1521,"type":16},"Performance","performance",{"name":1416,"slug":1417,"type":16},"2026-04-19T06:45:40.804",490,{"items":1526,"total":1638},[1527,1546,1563,1580,1595,1612,1622],{"slug":1528,"name":1528,"fn":1529,"description":1530,"org":1531,"tags":1532,"stars":26,"repoUrl":27,"updatedAt":1545},"3-statement-model","fill out 3-statement financial models","Complete, populate and fill out 3-statement financial model templates (Income Statement, Balance Sheet, Cash Flow Statement) . Use when asked to fill out model templates, complete existing model frameworks, populate financial models with data, complete a partially filled IS\u002FBS\u002FCF framework, or link integrated financial statements within an existing template structure. Triggers include requests to fill in, complete, or populate a 3-statement model template",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1533,1536,1539,1542],{"name":1534,"slug":1535,"type":16},"Excel","excel",{"name":1537,"slug":1538,"type":16},"Finance","finance",{"name":1540,"slug":1541,"type":16},"Financial Modeling","financial-modeling",{"name":1543,"slug":1544,"type":16},"Financial Statements","financial-statements","2026-05-15T06:08:35.416766",{"slug":1547,"name":1547,"fn":1548,"description":1549,"org":1550,"tags":1551,"stars":26,"repoUrl":27,"updatedAt":1562},"accrual-schedule","build period-end accrual schedules","Build the period-end accrual schedule — for each accrual, compute the entry, cite the support, and draft the JE. Use during month-end close; the JE is a draft for controller approval, not a posting.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1552,1555,1556,1559],{"name":1553,"slug":1554,"type":16},"Accounting","accounting",{"name":1537,"slug":1538,"type":16},{"name":1557,"slug":1558,"type":16},"Journal Entry","journal-entry",{"name":1560,"slug":1561,"type":16},"Month-End Close","month-end-close","2026-05-06T05:38:41.445686",{"slug":1564,"name":1564,"fn":1565,"description":1566,"org":1567,"tags":1568,"stars":26,"repoUrl":27,"updatedAt":1579},"ai-readiness","identify AI opportunities in portfolio companies","Scan the portfolio for the highest-leverage AI opportunities and rank where to deploy operating-partner time. Ingests quarterly updates and financials across multiple portfolio companies, identifies quick wins at each, and stacks them into a single ranked action list. Use during quarterly portfolio reviews, annual planning, or when deciding which companies get AI investment first. Triggers on \"AI readiness\", \"AI opportunity scan\", \"where should we deploy AI\", \"AI across the portfolio\", \"AI quick wins\", or \"which portcos are ready for AI\".",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1569,1572,1575,1578],{"name":1570,"slug":1571,"type":16},"AI Infrastructure","ai-infrastructure",{"name":1573,"slug":1574,"type":16},"Operations","operations",{"name":1576,"slug":1577,"type":16},"Private Equity","private-equity",{"name":24,"slug":25,"type":16},"2026-05-21T06:50:36.056814",{"slug":1581,"name":1581,"fn":1582,"description":1583,"org":1584,"tags":1585,"stars":26,"repoUrl":27,"updatedAt":1594},"audit-xls","audit spreadsheets for formula accuracy","Audit a spreadsheet for formula accuracy, errors, and common mistakes. Scopes to a selected range, a single sheet, or the entire model (including financial-model integrity checks like BS balance, cash tie-out, and logic sanity). Triggers on \"audit this sheet\", \"check my formulas\", \"find formula errors\", \"QA this spreadsheet\", \"sanity check this\", \"debug model\", \"model check\", \"model won't balance\", \"something's off in my model\", \"model review\".",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1586,1589,1590,1591],{"name":1587,"slug":1588,"type":16},"Audit","audit",{"name":1534,"slug":1535,"type":16},{"name":1537,"slug":1538,"type":16},{"name":1592,"slug":1593,"type":16},"Spreadsheets","spreadsheets","2026-05-15T06:07:23.536125",{"slug":1596,"name":1596,"fn":1597,"description":1598,"org":1599,"tags":1600,"stars":26,"repoUrl":27,"updatedAt":1611},"bond-futures-basis","analyze bond futures basis","Analyze the bond futures basis by pricing futures, identifying the cheapest-to-deliver, and comparing with yield curves to assess delivery option value and basis trading opportunities. Use when analyzing bond futures, computing the basis, identifying CTD bonds, calculating implied repo rates, or evaluating basis trades.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1601,1604,1605,1608],{"name":1602,"slug":1603,"type":16},"Derivatives","derivatives",{"name":1537,"slug":1538,"type":16},{"name":1606,"slug":1607,"type":16},"Fixed Income","fixed-income",{"name":1609,"slug":1610,"type":16},"Trading","trading","2026-05-15T06:08:13.647174",{"slug":1613,"name":1613,"fn":1614,"description":1615,"org":1616,"tags":1617,"stars":26,"repoUrl":27,"updatedAt":1621},"bond-relative-value","perform bond relative value analysis","Perform relative value analysis on bonds by combining pricing, yield curve context, credit spreads, and scenario stress testing. Use when analyzing bond richness\u002Fcheapness, computing spread decomposition, comparing bonds, assessing bond value vs curves, or running rate shock scenarios.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1618,1619,1620],{"name":1537,"slug":1538,"type":16},{"name":1606,"slug":1607,"type":16},{"name":1609,"slug":1610,"type":16},"2026-05-15T06:08:11.151011",{"slug":1623,"name":1623,"fn":1624,"description":1625,"org":1626,"tags":1627,"stars":26,"repoUrl":27,"updatedAt":1637},"break-trace","trace reconciliation breaks to source transactions","Root-cause a reconciliation break to its source transaction or posting — follow the audit trail from the break row back to the originating entry on each side and state what differs and why. Use after gl-recon has classified a break.",{"slug":8,"name":9,"logoUrl":10,"githubOrg":11},[1628,1629,1630,1633,1634],{"name":1553,"slug":1554,"type":16},{"name":1587,"slug":1588,"type":16},{"name":1631,"slug":1632,"type":16},"Debugging","debugging",{"name":1537,"slug":1538,"type":16},{"name":1635,"slug":1636,"type":16},"Reconciliation","reconciliation","2026-05-06T05:37:42.364074",62]